Precession of the LRL Vector in SR

utesfan100
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
This is a continuation of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=526249", now that my confusion on Thomas precession has been clarified and my root question has been shown to not stem from this effect.

In classical mechanics for any inverse square force, \vec{F}=-\frac{C}{r^2}\hat{r}, one has the Laplace-Runge-Lenz eccentricity vector. This is a constant of motion and has the magnitude of the eccentricity and points from the center of attraction towards the periapsis.

\vec{e}=\frac{\vec{L}\times \vec{p}}{mC} + \vec{r}

For the argument's sake, let's consider a charged mass in orbit about a much more massive oppositely charged mass under Coulomb's law (C=kQq), with a speed high enough that the SR effects are significantly larger than the effects of the curvature of space-time from the mass-energies involved.

Q1) How much precession would such an orbit have in SR? Is this twice the excess in the angle \theta given on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplac...lizations_to_other_potentials_and_relativity" evaluated between two consecutive apsis?

Q2) Is this the "Newtonian Model" that I have heard predicts half of the observed precession of Mercury (without clarification and attributed to Einstein), or does that model include a change to the inverse square law force due to the relativistic energy of the orbiting body? Half of the first order estimate of the DeSitter precession in GR would be \delta=\frac{3\pi C}{c^2rm_0}, C=GMm_0 and r being the semi-latus rectum of the precessing ellipse.

Thoughts) My guess is that the first order SR precession defined above is \delta_{SR}=\frac{\pi C}{c^2rm_0}, with an additional \delta_{E=mc^2}=\frac{2\pi C}{c^2rm_0} when the classical effects of Newton's theorem of rotating orbits is considered with the inverse square law adjusted by replacing the rest mass with the relativistic energy. I believe I have worked out the second half of this previously (http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336k/Newton/node45.html" ), but need to relocate those notes. I may have the factor of two in the wrong component, or my guess might be completely off base.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it safe to assume that with no comment on this post in over a month means that no obvious error exists in my assumptions?
 
Speaking of that integral in Wiki, how do you solve an integral of the form:

\theta = L \int^{u} \frac{du}{\sqrt{m^{2} c^{2} \left(\gamma^{2} - 1 \right) - L^{2} u^{2}}}

I would be content with the limit as \gamma and L are nearly constant. Setting X=\frac{mc\sqrt{\gamma^{2} - 1}}{L}=\frac{mv\gamma}{L} gives:

\theta = \int^{u} \frac{du}{\sqrt{X^{2} - u^{2}}} = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{u}{X}\right)\approx\sin^{-1}(1)=\pi

Now, if we have a perturbation from this, how does one determine whether to use the value from quadrant I or II?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top