Precise Definition of a Limit, Example Clarification

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the substitution of delta in a textbook example about limits. The user questions the arbitrary nature of the number 0.05, feeling it lacks explanation in the context provided. The key takeaway is that if x is within 0.05 of 3, then the function f(x) will be within 0.1 of 5, which clarifies the limit concept. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the definition of limits. Overall, the example illustrates the importance of precise delta values in limit calculations.
Chase.
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework problem. My textbook has an example for this subject and I'm having difficulty understanding it.

oSGvI.png


I follow the example up until the point at which it says, "Notice that 0 < | x - 3 | < (0.1)/2 = 0.05, then "

I don't understand why delta was substituted with (what seem to be) arbitrary numbers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the 0.05 came out of thin air because they didn't show you how they found it. You'll probably have practice doing that soon in your homework.

The point was, however, that if x is within 0.05 of 3, then f(x) will be within 0.1 of 5, which answers the question posed earlier.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K