Compare Precision & Accuracy: Speed of Light Measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter protractor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Precision
AI Thread Summary
Scientist B demonstrated greater accuracy in measuring the speed of light, with an average of 3.05*10^8 m/s, which is closer to the accepted value of 3.00*10^8 m/s. In contrast, Scientist A had greater precision, as their measurements were more closely grouped together despite one outlier. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between accuracy, which reflects closeness to the true value, and precision, which indicates consistency among measurements. A statistical approach to measuring precision was suggested to clarify the comparison further. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the different aspects of measurement quality in scientific experiments.
protractor
Messages
17
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two different scientists measured the speed of light four times.

Scientist A
3.80*108m/s
3.32*108m/s
3.10*108m/s
3.05*108m/s
Average 3.32*108m/s

Scientist B
2.90*108m/s
3.10*108m/s
3.24*108m/s
2.95*108m/s
Average 3.05*108m/s

Accepted value of speed of light =3.00*108m/s

Which had greater accuracy? Which scientist had greater precision? Explain.

Vocabulary terms
The closer the values of a measurement are to each other, the greater the precision.
Accuracy is how close the values accepted value

2. The attempt at a solution

Scientist B has greater accuracy because the average of scientist B is closer to the accepted value.

Scientist A has greater precision because the numbers are close to each other than scientist B.I'm not sure if scientist A has greater precision. The first measurement for scientist A 3.80*108m/s is not close in value to the other measurements. But the rest of the values for scientist A seem to be closer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd agree with you that scientist B has both greater accuracy and greater precision.

There is a commonly used statistic that scientists use to measure the precision of their measurements. Calculating that statistic for both scientists' datasets should make it clear which data set shows more precise measurements.
 
The most accurate measurement is the one closest to the "true" value, or in this case, accepted value. The most precise measurement is the one with the smallest error in the measurement.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top