Predicting Non-Rigid Body Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albeaver89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Motion
AI Thread Summary
Predicting the motion of non-rigid bodies involves applying similar mechanics as for rigid bodies, but the mathematics is more complex. While the center of mass motion remains consistent, additional degrees of freedom (DoF) require a more detailed approach. A general solution does not exist for all scenarios, necessitating the formulation of the Lagrangian for the specific system. This process helps in understanding the dynamics of articulated or soft bodies. Ultimately, predicting non-rigid body motion requires advanced mathematical techniques tailored to the system's characteristics.
Albeaver89
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to predict the motion of a non-rigid body?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you drop a cat on the sofa, you can easily predict that it will land paws-down.

Can you be more specific with your question?
 
Well what I mean is, we have all kinds of formulas for rigid bodies, can we just apply them to a non-rigid or fluid body, or are there different mechanics for non-rigid/fluid bodies?
 
The mechanics are the same. The math, however, becomes more complicated.
 
Center of mass motion is exactly the same for articulated or soft bodies. There is no general solution for other DoF, however. You'll have to write down the Lagrangian for the whole thing and see how you can go about solving it.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top