Predicting Universe Collapse: Understanding the Forces at Work

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on predicting the gravitational collapse of the universe and the forces influencing its expansion. Key points include the role of inflation in initiating expansion and the ongoing influence of an unexplained momentum that keeps it going. Without dark energy, a flat universe will asymptotically approach a zero expansion rate, while a slight excess in density could lead to an eventual contraction. The transition from expansion to contraction would be instantaneous, with no lag. Current theories suggest that if dark energy dominates, the universe will continue to expand indefinitely.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Just from these forces can one predict when the universe will start to gravitationally collapse?

Edit

Would there be a (lag) from expansion to contraction.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
wolram said:
Just from these forces can one predict when the universe will start to gravitationally collapse?

Hi Wolram,

I think something got lost in your question. Which forces in particular?

Jon
 
jonmtkisco said:
Hi Wolram,

I think something got lost in your question. Which forces in particular?

Jon

Silly me, Whatever it is that produces the Hubble flow and gravity, or may be i should ask,
can we predict when expansion will stop, will there be a lag before a re collapse.
 
Hi Wolram,

These are very broad questions. I am not aware of even an ATTEMPT to explain why expansion continues. As you know, the favored view at the moment is that inflation was the original motivation for expansion. Subsequently, some unexplained form of momentum is supposed to keep expansion going. But it is a strange form of momentum, because nothing actually "moves".

Objects continue to become further apart because they were already becoming further apart. They were already becoming further apart because of inflation. And inflation apparently caused objects to become further apart from each other at almost exactly the Newtonian escape velocity.

In the absence of Dark Energy or other cosmological constant, a flat universe (which ours approximates) will expand more and more slowly, but never at a zero expansion rate. In other words, the expansion will asymptotically approach zero.

If the universe is even slightly above critical density (say, by a total of 1 photon), then it will stop expanding at a certain point in time and begin contracting. There won't be a "pause" per se between expansion and contraction, it will be instantaneous. However, the expansion will be extreeeemely slow for a long time before it reaches zero and then begins contacting at an extreeeemely slow rate, which will accelerate over time.

If Lambda (Dark energy or cosmological constant) is sufficient to overcome the total force of gravity, then expansion will continue to accelerate at a geometrical rate. That is the current mainstream projection regarding Dark Energy. Such a universe will never contract.

Jon
 
Thanks jonmtkisco , it was a question that had me thinking.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top