Preferred and Unique Coordinate System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of coordinate systems in the context of relativity, particularly the idea that no coordinate system is preferred over another. Participants explore thought experiments involving spacecraft moving at relativistic speeds and the implications for time dilation and decay rates of radioactive material. The conversation touches on theoretical implications and the nature of time's passage in different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the relativity principle that all coordinate systems are equal, questioning how time's passage can be non-unique if physics is to remain consistent.
  • Another participant argues that each spacecraft's description of events is valid, suggesting that the Earth’s time cannot be considered more relevant or special than that of the spacecraft.
  • A modification of the thought experiment is proposed, where an astronaut experiences more time than another astronaut chasing after him, raising questions about the implications of different paths taken through spacetime.
  • Concerns are raised about identifying a unique coordinate system, with one participant suggesting that each region of space may have its own unique coordinate system that is not universally applicable.
  • Another participant introduces the idea of static solutions to Einstein's Field Equations (EFE) that may provide preferred coordinates in specific regions, but emphasizes that these are not unique in the general sense according to mainstream views of General Relativity.
  • A thought experiment involving synchronized clocks is presented, illustrating how acceleration affects the perception of time and the ticking of clocks in different frames of reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of coordinate systems and the implications of relativity. There is no consensus on whether a unique coordinate system exists or how to identify it, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of time's passage across different frames.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific solutions to the EFE and the implications for local versus global views in spacetime, indicating that while certain coordinate systems may be preferred in specific contexts, this does not imply a universal preference according to General Relativity.

mattharrigan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am confused about one of the basic findings of relativity, that all coordinate systems are equal and there is no preferred coordinate system.

A simple thought experiment is to consider three spacecraft called left, middle, and right. Left speeds off at half the speed of light in the left direction relative to middle, middle stays put, and right speeds off at half the speed of light in the other direction. Also on each spacecraft is an equal pile of material which radioactively decays. The classic conclusion would be that middle's clock would tick faster and the material on spacecraft middle would have decayed more than the material on either left or right and that the material on left and right would have decayed an equal amount. However why is that the case? In left’s opinion if there is no unique velocity, left would be perfectly justified in concluding that it wasn’t moving and that middle would be speeding away and right would be speeding away even faster. With that assumption left would conclude that its pile of material would have decayed the most and that right’s would have decayed the least. Right could conclude the exact opposite. An independent observer with relative motion could conclude something else. In reality each pile of radioactive material decayed a specific unique amount. In the classic sci-fi scene were an astronaut speeds away in an advanced spaceship and returns to meet his great great grandkids, who is to say that the astronaut could not spend years on the spaceship and once they returned only seconds went by on Earth? To insist that Earth's time ticked slower implies that Earth is a more relavent or special coordinate system.

Basically I think the rate of time's passage must be unique or else most of physics falls apart. Therefore there must be a unique coordinate system which energy levels must be measured against to get the "proper" rate of time's passage.

I do not think that any simple coordinate system applies to any large region of space, but instead each bit of space has a unique coordinate system which may be twisted and deformed relative to other locations.

Am I missing something basic here?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In reality each pile of radioactive material decayed a specific unique amount.

Nope. Each spacecraft 's description of what happens on the other ships is correct.

In the classic sci-fi scene were an astronaut speeds away in an advanced spaceship and returns to meet his great great grandkids, who is to say that the astronaut could not spend years on the spaceship and once they returned only seconds went by on Earth? To insist that Earth's time ticked slower implies that Earth is a more relavent or special coordinate system.

In this case, the Earth is on a free-fall trajectory while the spacecraft has a proper acceleration. A free-fall trajectory between two points always is either the longest or shortest path. In this case, it is the shortest. This does mean that the spacecraft must experience less time according to its own clock than Earth does according to its own clock.
 
mattharrigan said:
In the classic sci-fi scene were an astronaut speeds away in an advanced spaceship and returns to meet his great great grandkids, who is to say that the astronaut could not spend years on the spaceship and once they returned only seconds went by on Earth? To insist that Earth's time ticked slower implies that Earth is a more relavent or special coordinate system.
Let me modify this example a little bit so that the astronaut is the one who experiences more time.
And example is like this. Some time after astronaut have left Earth another astronaut leaves Earth and chases after him. When both astronauts meet second astronaut has aged less.

Do you see how this example is similar to yours?
Imagine triangle - then the person who is taking two sides of triangle is the one who experiences less time (other person takes one side).
 
mattharrigan said:
Basically I think the rate of time's passage must be unique or else most of physics falls apart. Therefore there must be a unique coordinate system which energy levels must be measured against to get the "proper" rate of time's passage.
Ok, let's stipulate that your thought and conclusion are correct. How do you identify this unique coordinate system?
mattharrigan said:
I do not think that any simple coordinate system applies to any large region of space, but instead each bit of space has a unique coordinate system which may be twisted and deformed relative to other locations.
Ok, let's stipulate that your thought and conclusion are correct. How do you identify these unique coordinate systems in each bit of space?
 
mattharrigan said:
I am confused about one of the basic findings of relativity, that all coordinate systems are equal and there is no preferred coordinate system.
...
Basically I think the rate of time's passage must be unique or else most of physics falls apart. Therefore there must be a unique coordinate system which energy levels must be measured against to get the "proper" rate of time's passage.

I do not think that any simple coordinate system applies to any large region of space, but instead each bit of space has a unique coordinate system which may be twisted and deformed relative to other locations.

Am I missing something basic here?
Thanks
Yes, you are missing the global view, still there is something to what you are saying in the local case, there are static solutions of the EFE that are limited to a certain region of the unverse, that give very good experimental predictions for solar system physics (think of the 4 classical GR tests). This regional static (and asymptotically flat) solution (not the general spacetime solution) has a coordinate system (schwarzschild coordinates) by definition.

Even for cosmological solutions you do have "preferred" coordinates (like the FRW coordinates) that are identified as those that equate rest to lack of dipole anisotropy wrt the CMB, and are the only ones with which one mathematically can clearly infer the universe expansion.
All of these are however not "unique" according to GR's mainstream view.
ghwellsjr said:
How do you identify this unique coordinate system?
See above caveats.
 
Do the same thought experiment, but before the rockets accelerate, place a huge amount of clocks from the middle towards the right side, and from the middle towards the left side. The clocks are synced before the acceleration.

Assume the rockets with each having an observer at the back of the rocket, accelerate instantaneously. The back of the rockets are at the same place as where the atomic clock in middle resides. The back of the rockets is also where the atomic clocks inside the rockets reside.

Acceleration is responsible for forcing the rockets left and right to change which inertial frame of reference they are at rest in.

You have to map all of the spacetime events into the new reference system, left is now at rest in for example.
When you do this, according to SR, you will see that locally, shortly after the acceleration, the atomic clocks are at zero still.

However, the clocks in the direction the rocket is moving towards(seen from middle's perspective), are now showing a higher counter (seen from left/right's perspective). Higher, the further away they are.

All the clocks put along the way are indeed ticking slower (seen from left/right's perspective). There is no doubt about this.
An observer inside the left rocket comparing clocks which are moving towards him at vrel (remember he considers himself at rest), will notice that all clocks passing by his atomic clock will always show a higher counter, even though they tick slower. This is because they move too fast towards him, not giving his atomic clock at the back of the rocket enough time to make up for the initial shift of the counters after the acceleration.

Just like when he accelerated initially, if he accelerates again and changes the frame he is at rest with to the frame middle is at rest in, locally there won't be any changes in the time clocks show. Again, in front and behind him, clocks will shift the counters. The direction he accelerated towards the clock counters will go up, while the counters of clocks behind will go down.

Since he never managed to get any clock moving towards him when being at rest in the other frame to display a lower value than his clock (edit: actually, the longer he is in that frame at rest, the higher the difference between his atomic clock and the incoming clocks will become, when comparing clocks moving towards him, right when they are next to his atomic clock).
When he accelerates and switches the frame he is at rest, to the same middle is at rest with, he will see all clocks along the line display the same time, as it should be in middle's frame, with his clock showing a lower counter. Lower, the longer he was in the former frame at rest.

He and his clock therefore aged less.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K