Preparing for STEP: Solving a Sphere Tangency Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Positronized
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
Positronized
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm preparing for the "Sixth-Term Examination Papers" (STEP) this June by going through the past papers. Unfortunately there isn't any solution available for the older past papers AND I've already finished high school which basically means I can't verify my solutions. So I thought it might be a good idea to post some of the problems (which I'm not so sure about) and my worked solution for comments/confirmation here. Will this be acceptable for these forums?

Anyway, here's one to start with:
Consider a sphere of radius a and a plane perpendicular to a unit vector ##\hat n##. The centre of the sphere has position vector ##\vec d## and the minimum distance from the origin to the plane is ##\ell##. What is the condition for the plane to be tangential to the sphere?

Here's my solution:
There are two planes which have the normal n and is \ell units from the origin. WLOG, consider the plane defined in its point-normal form as the set of all points r such that \left(\mathbf{r}-\ell\mathbf{n}\right)\cdot\mathbf{n}=0 and hence can be simplified to \mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{n}=\ell\;\;\mathrm{\left(\star\right)}.
The sphere can be defined as the set of all points r such that \left\Vert\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{d}\right\Vert=a.
If the plane is tangential to the sphere it must be perpendicular to the sphere at the point of tangency. That is, if r is the point of tangency then the direction of radius r-d must be the same as the direction of the plane's normal n. Since \left\Vert\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{d}\right\Vert=a we get \mathbf{r}-\mathbf{d}=\pm a\mathbf{n} since n is a unit vector, hence \mathbf{r}=\mathbf{d}\pm a\mathbf{n}. (the \pm is to take into account both possible directions of n)

Substitute this into (*) above to obtain \left(\mathbf{d}\pm a\mathbf{n}\right)\cdot\mathbf{n}=\ell. Therefore, we get the required condition \ell=\left| \left(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{d}\right)\pm a \right|.

Is this a correct/complete answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fixed the problem statement to make it readable, and adjusted the formatting.

Seems like an interesting problem that someone might want to take a crack at, despite the age of the post.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top