Pressure, diameter and flow in a pneumatic system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on optimizing air flow in a pneumatic system by changing the internal diameter of hoses and fittings. The user is currently using a 1/4" ID hose with a 3/8" ID outlet from a compressed air tank operating at 160 psi. The user seeks to understand the potential performance improvement in peak torque output from an impact wrench by switching to a 3/8" ID hose. Recommendations include measuring pressure drop with an inline gauge and consulting manufacturer guidelines for hose sizing and pressure loss calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pneumatic systems and their components
  • Familiarity with pressure regulators and their settings
  • Knowledge of hose diameter impacts on air flow
  • Ability to interpret pressure drop calculations and manufacturer specifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "pressure drop calculations for pneumatic systems" to quantify performance changes
  • Learn about "recommended hose sizes for air tools" from manufacturers
  • Investigate "impact of hose length on air flow" to optimize setup
  • Explore "friction factors for different hose materials" to enhance system efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Pneumatic system engineers, maintenance technicians, and anyone involved in optimizing air delivery for tools in portable compressor setups.

Simple_One
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have a problem (which is likely to be fairly simple), which I need a hand to resolve. I'm trying to determine the impact of changing the internal diameter of the hose/fitting system in a compressed air system (in this case a portable compressor, with an inbuilt air receiver).

The starting information is as follows...
Compressed air tank outlet diameter: 3/8" ID (9.525mm)
Compressed air tank pressure: 160 psi (1,103.16 kPa)
Compressed air tank size: 1.94231 cubic feet (55L)
Piping and fitting size: 1/4" ID (6.35mm)
Hose length: 20m

The system is fitted with a 1/4" ID pressure regulator, straight after the outlet from the air reciever, and this regulator is set to 90 PSI.

The question is, since the receiver has a 3/8 outlet but is being constricted by the air hose and fittings 1/4 ID, how much extra air flow could I expect to gain by moving to a 3/8 ID hose and fitting system?

Somewhat more specifically, I'm looking at this from the point of the peak torque output from an impact wrench. I'm not certain what factors influence the torque output of these tools, but most of them list a peak air requirement (in L/min or cubic feet per minute) which I assume would correlate with the published peak torque (up to the devices engineered safety limits etc). Most have a maximum operating pressure of 90 PSI, hence the regulator setting.

All other things being equal (and assuming i don't exceed any engineered limits on the pneumatic tool), I would anticipate better performance from the tool if the air hose and fitting system all the way from the receiver outlet was of a larger ID (3/8 vs 1/4), the real question is, how much better...?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
So, should I take it from the lack of response that it's not possible to calculate what I'm seeking with the information provided, or that it is unclear what I'm asking?
 
To calculate the pressure drop vs flow you need the friction factor for the hose. This is something I don't know. Have you looked at the compressor / hose / tool manufacturer's websites? They should have charts or tables or at least "thumb rules" for system design. These might be in the form of recommended hose diameter vs hose length. I think a 20 meter hose is on the long side, if you really need hose that long it would be better to use a larger diameter. Another option is to use hard pipe for most of the length, and put the regulator and hose connection closer to the work. This allows higher pressure closer to the work and shorter hose.
 
Hi, thanks for the advice. Unfortunately this system is a portable one so fixed tubing isn't an option, otherwise I would be doing it :)

I'm going to get a small pressure gauge that I can fit inline at the end of the current system so I can measure pressure drop across the current setup. If it seems to be a significant drop, then I'll just suck up the cost and upgrade the whole show to 3/8" or maybe even 1/2" all the way through. Then I know that the air delivery system is as good as it can be (within practical limits for portability etc) and if more air is needed, I can just swap the whole show on to a larger compressor.

I'll do a rudimentary calculation based on this data as well:
http://www.airtx.com/recommended-air-hoses.htm

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I just googled
Air tool hose size
Got lots of hits. I'd say some of the advise is good and some is misguided. But if you read thru you can make up your own mind. Me, I'd get some 3/8 hose. You don't necessarily have to change all the fittings since a lot of the losses are in the hose.
 
Similar question, no real answers, more focused on the air tool than the flow/pressure, despite what the OP asked. I'm going to stick with the obvious theory that larger diameter equals more goodness. How much extra goodness I still haven't determined; but definitely extra goodness.

I'll also cut the existing 20m hose in half and add another quick connect, at least that way I'm only incurring the extra pressure drop when it's necessary with that hose.

This link has some handy tables relating to hose diameters, flow and pressure drop:
http://www.airtx.com/recommended-air-hoses.htm

Looks like 1/2 ID would always work fine for my purposes. I'll save some pennies and then go for that in the longer run.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
904
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K