Pressure evolution in an engine intake manifold (thermodynamics)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the pressure evolution in an engine intake manifold using thermodynamic principles. The user identifies a discrepancy between two equations modeling pressure change: one derived from the ideal gas law and mass conservation, and another based on the first principle of thermodynamics for open systems. The key issue lies in the inclusion of the Gamma coefficient in the latter equation, which is absent in the former. The user concludes that the first analysis incorrectly assumes constant temperature, while the second analysis fails for other unspecified reasons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law and its application in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the first principle of thermodynamics for open systems
  • Knowledge of specific heat capacities (Cp and Cv) and their significance
  • Basic concepts of mass flow rates in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the impact of temperature variations on pressure calculations in thermodynamic systems
  • Explore the derivation and application of the first principle of thermodynamics in open systems
  • Learn about the significance of the Gamma coefficient in thermodynamic equations
  • Examine real-world examples of pressure evolution in engine intake manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, thermodynamicists, and automotive professionals involved in engine design and performance optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Gtonio
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am using a model that estimates pressure (P) in an intake manifold. I think there is a mistake in its equations but I cannot find it.

To simplify the problem we can make the following assumptions:
- Only air fills the manifold: air comes into the manifold through the throttle (mass flow rate = mf_thr) and is pumped by the engine through the inlet valve (mass flow rate = mf_vlv).
- Heat transfer is neglected: adiabatic manifold.
- Air expansion through throttle is isenthalpic: if upstream throttle air temperature is a constant, then manifold temperature is a constant (T).

Ideal gas law states: P = (R.T/V).m, with m = manifold air mass and V = manifold volume. With above assumptions (T = constant) and mass conservation law:
dP/dt = (R.T/V).dm/dt = (R.T/V).(mf_thr – mf_vlv) {A}

However, model equations are as follow:
- First principle of thermo for open systems (no heat transfer and no work): dU/dt = mf_thr.h_thr – mf_vlv.h_ vlv [0], with h = specific enthalpy, U = internal energy of air in intake manifold
- Internal energy and enthalpy of an ideal gas: U = m.Cv.T, h = Cp.T, with Cp and Cv assumed to be constants on the considered temperature range.
- Derivative of U = m.Cv.T: dU/dt = Cv . (dm/dt . T + dT/dt . m) [1]
- Derivative of ideal gas law P = m.R.T/V: dP/dt = R/V . (dm/dt . T + dT/dt . m) [2]
- [1] and [2] give: dP/dt = R/(Cv.V) . dU/dt [3]
- [3] and [0] give: dP/dt = R/(Cv.V) . (mf_thr.h_thr – mf_vlv.h_ vlv)
=> dP/dt = R/(Cv.V) . (mf_thr.Cp.T_thr – mf_vlv.Cp.T_vlv), with T_thr = temperature at throttle level, T_vlv = temperature at inlet valve level
=> dP/dt = R.Gamma/V . (mf_thr.T_thr – mf_vlv.T_vlv), with Gamma = Cp/Cv

If T_thr = T_vlv = T (manifold temperature), then:
dP/dt = (R.T.Gamma/V).(mf_thr – mf_vlv) {B}

Equation contains Gamma coefficient, which is not present in equation [A]. Where is the mistake?

Thanks in advance for helping me to understand this tricky problem.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The first analysis assumes that the temperature is constant, which is incorrect because expansion cooling and compression heating of the gas within the manifold. The second analysis does take into account the temperature variation, but the analysis is incorrect for other reasons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K