Principia: Most Useful Propositions & Abridged Version

  • Thread starter Thread starter Geremia
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Newton suggested that students focus on specific sections of his "Principia" to manage their time effectively, particularly emphasizing the Definitions, Laws of Motion, and the first three Sections of the first Book. This guidance is found in the introduction to the third volume. While some discussions suggest that Newton wrote in a complex style to challenge only the most dedicated students, there are also numerous abridged versions available that simplify his work. One notable abridged version is "Newton's Principia: The Central Argument" by Green Lion Press, which provides commentary and removes less relevant sections, though it remains a substantial read rather than a quick summary.
Geremia
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
I heard that Newton, or perhaps someone else, in the introduction to the Principia mentioned what the most useful propositions are to study, because he realized the average student didn't have the time to go through 100% of the propositions. What were these most useful propositions? What would an "abridged Principia" be? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What!? Newton intentionally wrote all of his works in the most twisted, convoluted, and difficult-to-understand manner precisely because, allegedly, he wanted only the most dedicated students to work to understand his works. Or you know, he was just nuts. But I can't find any 'abridged propositions' in my copy (Green Lion Press).

However, there are many abridged versions of Newton's Principia, which isn't the same as what you're thinking of (as abridged versions are the original with notes added, commentary, or irrelevant sections taken out). One good one is also by Green Lion Press, and it's called 'Newton's Principia: The Central Argument'. You can check out some of what it includes in it's website, but it is still relatively thick. It's not boring, but if you're looking for a quick-and-dirty pamphlet, this isn't it.
http://www.greenlion.com/principi.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Newton's Own Abridged Principia

Newton's advise for reading his Principia (intro. of 3rd vol.):
It is enough if one carefully reads the Definitions, the Laws of Motion, and the first three Sections of the first Book. He may then pass on to this Book, and consult such of the remaining Propositions of the first two Books, as the references in this, and his occasions, shall require.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Back
Top