MHB Probability of Number 4 Appearing in 100 Tosses? - ASK

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The probability of rolling a 4 on a die is 1/6, leading to an expected frequency of approximately 16.67 occurrences when tossed 100 times. The discussion highlights that expected values can be fractional and do not need to be rounded to whole numbers unless specified. It emphasizes that expected value represents a long-term average rather than a guaranteed outcome. Thus, the expected frequency can be expressed as 16 2/3 without needing to round it to 16 or 17. Understanding expected value is crucial in probability calculations.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
A die is tossed 100 times. What's the expected frequency that the number appears will be 4?

The probability is 1/6, so the expected frequency is 1/6 × 100, but that results in a fraction (16 2/3). Do we need to round it up or down? Is the answer 16 or 17?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
A die is tossed 100 times. What's the expected frequency that the number appears will be 4?

The probability is 1/6, so the expected frequency is 1/6 × 100, but that results in a fraction (16 2/3). Do we need to round it up or down? Is the answer 16 or 17?

Why does it have to be 16 or 17? Just call it $$16\dfrac{2}{3}$$. There is no rule which says that expected value must be an attainable value (unless it is expressly stated at the start of the problem). Expected value is essentially the long term average. The analogy would be a math class where you get 85 on the first test and 86 on the second. Your average is 85.5 (which is usually a non-attainable score).
 
Okay then, thanks.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top