Probability of target shooting question

  • Thread starter Thread starter pixel01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

It's rather long time I haven't dealt with maths. Now I have this problem.
A man can shoot right on the target with the probability of success of p = 30%. The question is how many shots does he need to shoot to be 95% (P) successful.

My idea is :
Let n the number of shots needed. Then P = p^n+p^(n-1)*q+p^(n-2)*q^2...+p*q(n-1)
where q=1-p.
Am i right and if yes, how can I shorten the result?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the expansion p^n + n*p^(n-1) +++q^n, it is the first term that tells us the probability that all of the n shots would be successful. The next term tells us of one failue and n-1 successes. But those terms are not what we are looking for. So I think that's a start on the problem.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top