Probable electron field emission switch

AI Thread Summary
Electron field emission technology has potential as a high voltage switch, surpassing semiconductor limitations due to vacuum's insulating properties. The control voltage required to initiate electron emission is significantly lower than the full voltage applied between the cathode and anode. This method is more robust than traditional thermionic vacuum tubes, as it does not rely on a heated cathode that can degrade over time. The discussion explores the mechanics of applying a large potential difference to induce electron flow and the possibility of using a middle electrode to control this flow. Understanding these principles could lead to advancements in high voltage switching applications.
sondreL
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi again , i did some reading about this topic on google and there were only a few articles about it , so I would like to ask you for some advice.I ask this from a previous thread i asked about electrons in vacuum. Could electron field emission technology be used as a high voltage switch were semiconductor device limits are far exceeded ?

as far as I undersand it now the pluses are that vacuum is a good insulator and the control voltage to turn on the field emission is not the full voltage applied between the cathode (tip) and anode (plate) of the field emission device , but only the amount of voltage shortly before the threshold of the field emission and slightly abive it as to reach the level at which a electron current path forms and then again lower the voltage below the threshold to stop the electron emission. Any info on the subject is much appreciatted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How familiar are you with the vacuum tube technology that was used before the invention of the transistor?
 
Well , I have read about vacuum tube technology , the most widly used types of tubes were thermionic ones , were the electrons came from a low voltage heated cathode , probably that explains why the old TV sets usually took about 30 seconds to get to the picture after switch on , te tubes were heating up to the point were normal electron emission could occur. I also understand how these tubes were used as switches even in the first computers , with a middle mesh type plate being altered between ground and negative potential which would repel the incoming electrons from the cathode.So I recetly came upon field emission , I understand the basic concept , that the E field strength is dependant on the amount of charge in a given surface , since a small very sharp tip has a very tiny surface applying a large potential difference across the tip and a plate some distance away from it causes an extremely large E field to develop at the end of the tip and around it , large enough to push of electrons.Now I guess this vacuum tube method is much more robust because there is no hot cathode that burns out with time.

My question is how precisely this can be used as a high voltage switch or any voltage switch , I would like to understand the details. Like for example do you apply a large PD across the tip and the plate and then use a much smaller voltage to either overcome the threshold for electron emission or go below it which would either start a current between the tip and plate or cut it off? Or maybe one uses some kind of middle electrode with which to repel the incoming electrons if the current needs to be swithed off ?
 
Anyone interested, please?
 
sondreL said:
Well , I have read about vacuum tube technology , the most widly used types of tubes were thermionic ones , were the electrons came from a low voltage heated cathode , probably that explains why the old TV sets usually took about 30 seconds to get to the picture after switch on , te tubes were heating up to the point were normal electron emission could occur. I also understand how these tubes were used as switches even in the first computers , with a middle mesh type plate being altered between ground and negative potential which would repel the incoming electrons from the cathode.So I recetly came upon field emission , I understand the basic concept , that the E field strength is dependant on the amount of charge in a given surface , since a small very sharp tip has a very tiny surface applying a large potential difference across the tip and a plate some distance away from it causes an extremely large E field to develop at the end of the tip and around it , large enough to push of electrons.Now I guess this vacuum tube method is much more robust because there is no hot cathode that burns out with time.

My question is how precisely this can be used as a high voltage switch or any voltage switch , I would like to understand the details. Like for example do you apply a large PD across the tip and the plate and then use a much smaller voltage to either overcome the threshold for electron emission or go below it which would either start a current between the tip and plate or cut it off? Or maybe one uses some kind of middle electrode with which to repel the incoming electrons if the current needs to be swithed off ?

Vacuum tubes are actually still used for some HV, high power applications like radio transmission towers and high-power radars. The Wikipedia article is a good introduction to how they are configured for different electrical component functions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_tube

:-)
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top