Problem: Estimating pressure of compressive garment

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwertypie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the pressure generated by active compression garments using shape memory alloys, specifically Nitinol, which can recover strains of about 6%. The pressure is created through the actuation and subsequent release of the fibers, similar to passive compression garments. Key considerations include the nature of the fabric weave, the arrangement of fibers, and the need for biaxial stress-strain experiments to accurately model the garment's performance. An equation for hoop stress was mentioned, but it may not accurately reflect the complexities of the material's behavior. Overall, a more comprehensive theoretical approach is necessary to predict the garment's properties effectively.
qwertypie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Basically, I'm working on a project to make active compression garments instead of passive. There are a few materials that can actuate with large recoverable strains, and I want to use them to create the compression. I need to estimate how much pressure they could create based on the recoverable strain they are capable of producing though. This would be either by constricting upon actuation or expanding upon actuation and the pressure being generated upon release of stimulus as the fibers try to return to normal, like with regular passive compression garments. I just need a rough estimate, or just the idea of how I would model this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you really think it's the radial growth and contraction of the fibers that causes the compression?

Are the fibers embedded in a matrix, or is it a fabric? Are the fibers single ply? What is the nature of the fabric weave>
 
Chestermiller said:
Do you really think it's the radial growth and contraction of the fibers that causes the compression?

Are the fibers embedded in a matrix, or is it a fabric? Are the fibers single ply? What is the nature of the fabric weave>
It's using shape memory alloys. Just to have some numbers, an alloy called Nitinol can recover strains up to ~6% after a phase transition. Nasa developed a device for rock splitting that use modified nitinol expanding elements that were capable of generating stresses in excess of 1.5 GPa at only 2-3 percent corresponding strain. In the time waiting, I found an equation for hoop stress, equated the stress to the young's modulus of the material x the strain, and solved for pressure. But I imagine that's wildly inaccurate to the real situation, which would be a cross-hatched weave where the lateral fibers contain the SMA wires as a core and some cladding.
 
You need to do biaxial stress-strain experiments on the woven fabric, or you need some sort of theoretical development to predict the biaxial stress-strain properties from the fiber geometry, the weave geometry, and the frictional characteristics of the fibers.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top