Can You Solve This Queendom Classical IQ Test Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter recon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem presented involves determining the minimum number of businesspeople who possess all four attributes: a cellular phone, a beeper, fluency in at least two languages, and wearing a suit. By analyzing the overlaps among the groups, the minimum overlap for the first two attributes is calculated to be 65. Combining this with the third attribute results in a minimum overlap of 40, and further combining with the fourth attribute yields a final minimum overlap of 10. Therefore, the least possible number of individuals with all four attributes is 10. This conclusion is reached through a systematic approach to minimizing overlaps among the groups.
recon
Messages
399
Reaction score
1
I'm not able to solve this problem that appears as Question 23 on the queendom Classical IQ Test. Could someone please help?

One hundred businesspeople gather at a meeting. 85 of them carry a cellular phone, 80 of them have a beeper, 75 of them speak at least two languages and 70 of them wear a suit. Therefore, a certain number of them have all of the above: a cell phone AND a beeper AND speak at least two languages AND wear a suit. Out of these 100 businesspeople, what is the least possible number who have all of the above?

The choices are: 10 - 15 - 17 - 18 - 20.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'll vote for 10 :)
 
Start with 85 and 80 and try to "squeeze them into a space of 100" with the minumum possible overlap. You find the minumum overlap of the tw oattributes is 85+80-100 = 65.

Now you have a new group of 65 which have both attributes. Try to combine this group of 65 with the group of 75 while keeping the overlap (corresponding to people possessing all three attributes) to a minimum. You get a minimum overlap of 65+75-100=40.

Finally try to combine this group of 40 with the group of 70 and you get a minimum overlap (corresponding to persons having all four attributes) of 70+40-100=10
 
15 have no cells, but have everything else
20 have no beeper, but have everything else
25 speak 1 language, but have all the other stuff
30 have no suits, but have all other stuff

add 'em up to 90, subtract from 100 and you get 10

Njorl
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top