Problem on Parallelogram proof

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallelogram Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to proving that a quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram, with a focus on the properties of triangles and midsegments. Participants explore geometric relationships and theorems relevant to the proof, including the triangle midsegment theorem and the conditions for triangle similarity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions drawing line QS and suggests that midpoints of the trapezium may be relevant to the proof.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between segments AD and QS in triangle PQS, proposing that AD should equal half of QS.
  • It is noted that AD is parallel to QS as a midsegment in triangle PQS, and that this implies AD is parallel to BC.
  • There is a claim that the equality of lengths AD and BC, as well as AB and DC, supports the definition of a parallelogram.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the definition of an equiangular triangle, stating that the problem does not imply all angles are equal.
  • Another participant clarifies that the problem asks to show that triangles PST and QRT have equal angles, leading to their similarity.
  • A later reply confirms that angles PST and QRT are equal due to corresponding angles formed by parallel lines, supporting the similarity of the triangles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of triangle properties and the definitions involved. There is no consensus on the proof's approach or the interpretation of certain geometric terms.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the properties of the trapezium and the specific conditions for triangle similarity remain unaddressed. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps related to the proof.

mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • New Document 217.jpg
    New Document 217.jpg
    76.4 KB · Views: 169
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB, mathlearn! (Wave)

Our goal here is not to simply provide detailed solutions to posted problems, but rather to help the student by engaging them in the process of arriving to a solution. The student benefits more by doing than by watching.

We expect for you to post what you've tried so far, in order that we can see where you are stuck and how you might be going astray so we can address those points to help guide you in the right direction.

You've posted 3 questions so far without any work shown, so please revisit your 3 threads and include your attempts at solving them and our helpers will be able to provide help aimed specifically at your needs. :)
 
S far i have drawn the Line QS other than that i think it has got to to do some thing with the midpoints of the trapezium

- - - Updated - - -

So far i have drawn the Line QS other than that i think it has got to to do some thing with the midpoints of the trapezium
 
Consider triangle $PQS$. What is true about segments $\overline{AD}$ and $\overline{QS}$ ?
 
Dear greg1313,

Considering the triangle PQS I think AD should be equal to half of QS. And I am still no seeing a way to prove that ABCD is a parallelogram
 
Am I missing something? An equiangular triangle means that all three angles are equal (in other words, the same as equilateral). In the given problem that is not (in general) going to be true.
 
mathlearn said:
Considering the triangle PQS I think AD should be equal to half of QS. And I am still no seeing a way to prove that ABCD is a parallelogram
Yes, $AD=QS/2$, but also $AD$ is parallel to $QS$ as a midsegment in $\triangle PQS$ (the triangle midsegment theorem). Similarly, $BC$ is parallel to $QS$. Therefore, $AD$ is parallel to $BC$. In a similar way one proves that $AB$ is parallel to $DC$. And the fact that opposite sides are parallel is one of the equivalent definitions of a parallelogram.

Actually, the fact that $AD=BC=QS/2$ and $AB=DC=PR/2$ is yet another one of the equivalent definitions of a parallelogram.

mrtwhs said:
Am I missing something? An equiangular triangle means that all three angles are equal (in other words, the same as equilateral). In the given problem that is not (in general) going to be true.
Apparently, the problem asks to show that the two triangles $PST$ and $QRT$ have their respective angles equal, not that all angles are equal in one triangle. In this case, $\triangle PST$ and $\triangle QRT$ are similar, which implies the equality in item v.
 
Thank you for your detailed explanation.Going ahead

View attachment 5781

Help me to say $$\triangle PST and\triangle QRT $$are equiangular triangles

and show PS/QR=PT/QT

Many thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 128
$\angle PST=\angle QRT$ because these are corresponding angles at parallel lines $PS$ and $QR$. Similarly $\angle SPT=\angle RQT$. Angle $T$ is common to both triangles. Thus, the triangles are similar. This link gives an equivalent definition of similarity in terms of side ratios.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K