Problem using integral form of Work K.E. Thm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time it takes for the Earth to fall towards the Sun after losing its orbital velocity. The context is rooted in gravitational physics and the work-energy theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy theorem and the setup of the integral for calculating time. There are questions about the bounds of integration and the implications of the velocity equation leading to imaginary results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the negative sign in the velocity equation and the use of WolframAlpha for integration, but no consensus has been reached on the source of the imaginary results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the assumptions about the distances involved, particularly the initial and final positions of the Earth relative to the Sun. There is also a focus on the implications of using different bounds for the integral.

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have this problem where the Earth immediately loses all orbital velocity and begins to fall towards the sun, and I need to find the time it takes for the Earth to hit it.
Seemed straight forward enough.

Homework Equations



Started with the work k.e. theorem,
.5mv(x)2-.5mvo2=∫[from xo to x]F(x)dx.
Where m=the mass of the earth, vo=0, and F(x)=F(r)=-GMm/r2 where M is the mass of the sun.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I made the bounds translate from xo→x to rAU→r(t). Solved the integral and got
v(x)=sqrt(-2GM((1/rAU)-(1/r(t))))
Seeing as how r(t) is never going to get bigger than 1 AU, this doesn't make any sense. The answer is already imaginary, and I haven't even gotten to the integral for solving for t(r) yet. Anybody know what I did wrong?

note: In case it wasn't that obvious, I'm using the initial position of the Earth as rAU and the final point I'm trying to get the Earth to is the radius of the sun, ill just write as ro. The center of the sun is the origin of the coordinate system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skate_nerd said:

Homework Statement



I have this problem where the Earth immediately loses all orbital velocity and begins to fall towards the sun, and I need to find the time it takes for the Earth to hit it.
Seemed straight forward enough.

Homework Equations



Started with the work k.e. theorem,
.5mv(x)2-.5mvo2=∫[from xo to x]F(x)dx.
Where m=the mass of the earth, vo=0, and F(x)=F(r)=-GMm/r2 where M is the mass of the sun.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I made the bounds translate from xo→x to rAU→r(t). Solved the integral and got
v(x)=sqrt(-2GM((1/rAU)-(1/r(t))))
Seeing as how r(t) is never going to get bigger than 1 AU, this doesn't make any sense. The answer is already imaginary, and I haven't even gotten to the integral for solving for t(r) yet. Anybody know what I did wrong?

note: In case it wasn't that obvious, I'm using the initial position of the Earth as rAU and the final point I'm trying to get the Earth to is the radius of the sun, ill just write as ro. The center of the sun is the origin of the coordinate system.

Is r(t) smaller or larger than rAU during the motion of the Earth towards the sun? So what is the sign of -(1/rAU -1/r(t))?
You got the magnitude of the velocity from conservation of energy. How do you define the vector v in terms of dr/dt?

ehild
 
Last edited:
Okay I looked at that wrong, however i still end up running into a problem later.
I eventually get that
v(r)=sqrt(2GM([1/r(t)]-[1/rAU])).
I need to find t(r), which would be
t(r)=∫(from rAU to rsun)dr/v(r).
→=1/(sqrt(2GM))∫(from rAU to rsun)dr/(sqrt([1/r(t)]-[1/rAU])
This is a very gross integral that I plugged into wolframalpha, and got a very long answer for, and when I plugged in the bounds I got imaginary numbers again.
 
You miss a minus sign. dr/dt=-v=-sqrt(2GM([1/r(t)]-[1/rAU])), as r is decreasing.
You can find the same problem here in Physicsforums. Try to search. The integral can be done with suitable substitution.

ehild
 
Maybe I'm missing something, but putting a negative sign before all of that wouldn't help me avoid getting an imaginary answer.
 
You should not get imaginary answer. Using AU as unit of distance, and approximating the final distance as 0, type in int _1^0 (1/sqrt(1/x-1)dx) in Wolframalpha. As I see, Wolframalpha does integration by parts.

ehild
 
Okay, that's somewhat satisfying. But how come if you don't approximate the final distance as zero, and instead make the bounds from 2 to 1 (since I was planning on going from 1 AU to the radius of the sun), you get an imaginary number?
 
The bounds are from 1AU to the radius of the Sun, which is much less than 1 AU.
Use indefinite integral in wolframalpha and see what you get. The solution is real for x<1AU

I have to leave now.

ehild
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K