Problem with diffraction equations (diffraction and astrophysics)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the diffraction equations used in astrophysics, specifically the equations for maxima and minima in light diffraction. The equation sinθ = nλ/d is correctly applied to both scenarios, where d represents either the mirror diameter in telescopes or the distance from the grating to the screen. The distinction lies in the context of the sources: gratings involve multiple point sources, while the Airy disc pertains to a single extended source. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the principles of Fraunhofer diffraction and its applications in astrophysics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fraunhofer diffraction principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of Airy discs in optics
  • Knowledge of the Huygens principle in wave theory
  • Basic grasp of Fourier transforms in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Airy minima formula
  • Explore the concept of single slit diffraction patterns
  • Learn about the relationship between convolution and multiplication in Fourier transforms
  • Investigate the role of diffraction gratings in optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying astrophysics, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light diffraction and its mathematical foundations.

IQScience
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey everyone. Just as a preface so you all know, I'm in England studying AQA Physics A.
I'm currently studying the optional astrophysics module.
I have a problem - in all the textbooks and revision guides I have, there is a topic on diffraction of light through a grating (Unit 2 topic), and there's a topic in my Collins Unit 5 textbook on resolving power of telescopes (Unit 5 optional topic astrophysics).First of all, in the Unit 2 diffraction topic, it states that for light being diffracted, the equation for finding the maxima is given by sinθ = nλ/d (where n = a whole number (integer)).

However, in the Unit 5 astrophysics resolving power of telescopes topic, it states that for light being diffracted (and forming an Airy disc), the equation for finding the minima is given by sinθ = nλ/d (where n = a whole number (integer)).

I'm really confused here, because both are examples of light diffraction and I have no idea whatsoever why the same equation has been used to describe the locations of maxima and minima. It just doesn't make sense.

Help pls?

edit: I should note that in the equation, d = mirror diameter (telescopes) or distance from grating to screen (gratings).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't find your Airy minima formula: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airy_disk has quite different numbers...

Anyway, for gratings with sinθ = nλ/d you have a correct formula that applies to a series of equidistant (distance d) line sources. They simply add up constructively if path differences are an integer number times λ.

The Airy formula is for one single extended circle-shaped source (diameter d). Difficult to compare with the above. Basically, all the points of the source (aperture) act as point sources (Huygens principle) and the diffraction pattern is an integral over the source. See Fraunhofer_diffraction, in particular "circular aperture" and "single slit".

In fact, for a comparson with the grating, it's a bit easier to look at the single slit diffraction pattern.

All are Fraunhofer diffraction patterns and they are a beautiful entrance to the world of Fourier transforms. Turns out that a convolution in one domain is a multiplication in the other. So the diffraction pattern of a sequence of slits with a certain width is the product of the sinθ = nλ/d of the centers of the slits at distances d times the diffraction pattern of a single slit with e.g. width d/4.

There's a lot of nice things to explore and play with in hyperphysics on Fraunhofer
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
6K