How Can I Derive Sumations with Multiple Indices and Powers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jetoso
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a complex summation involving multiple indices and powers of z. The initial summations for P(z) and Q(z) are provided, along with a more intricate double summation that needs simplification. The key to solving the problem lies in switching the order of summation and applying a change of variables. Although one participant suggests that the solution is trivial, others express confusion about the process and the reasoning behind it. The conversation highlights the challenges in manipulating indices and understanding the implications of changing the order of summation.
jetoso
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I have a hard time trying to figure it out how to derive the following sumations:

We know that:
P(z) = Sumation from j=0 to Infinity of [(Pj * (z^j)]
and
Q(z) = Sumation from j=0 to Infinity of [(Kj * ((z^j)]

Where j is a subindex for P and K, and a power for z.


Sumation from j=0 to Infinity of [ Sumation from i=0 to j+1 of [(z^j) * Pi * Kj-i+1] ]

Where i and j are a subindices for P and K, and a power for z.



I know that I have to play with the indices, but I have no clue. Any advice??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I may be missing something, but I can't see what your question is?
 
Reply

Yes, you are right.
From the information above, it has to be simplified to:
[ (1/z) * P(z) * Q(z) ] - [ (1/z) * Po * Q(z) ]

The author of the book does not give much more information about how he derived this equation, but he says is trivial.
 
The basic trick is to switch the order of summation. Then you will have two parts. The main part has i=1,inf with j=i-1,inf. The other part has i=0 with j=0,inf. For the main part let n=j-i+1 (replacing j), then n=0,inf. Put it all together and you should get the required answer.
 
Sorry

I am sorry, but I still do not get it.
 
Do you understand switching the order of summation?
Do you see the result of switching?
Do you understand the change of variables (n=)?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top