Problems with numerical illiteracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter torquerotates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numerical
AI Thread Summary
In upper division math courses, particularly in linear algebra and probability, proficiency in mental arithmetic is not a critical requirement. Students with strong spatial skills, logic, and a solid grasp of algebra can succeed even if they struggle with basic calculations. The focus in advanced mathematics is on understanding abstract concepts and creative problem-solving rather than quick mental computation. Instances of professors making arithmetic errors during lectures highlight that even experienced mathematicians can falter in basic calculations, emphasizing that the ability to think critically and grasp complex ideas is far more important than speed in arithmetic. Concerns about being judged for arithmetic skills are common, but the academic community generally values conceptual understanding over computational speed.
torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
How good do I have to be with numbers in upper division math( esp. linear algebra and probability)? I have pretty good spatial skills, logic and algebra( I can solve differential equations quickly with little error). I got mostly A's in lower division math and, if it counts for anything, physics courses. Yet when it comes to basic stuff like multiplying numbers mentally and correctly keeping track of decimal places in basic operations, I'm sunk. I mean, it's not that I can do the math(though some of it isn't awfully intuitive), its just that I'm not quick like most math/science majors. My little brother can do arithmetic faster than me and he got a D in Calc. =(.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, dude, get that stuff out of your head. That's what calculators are for. As sad as it sounds, there are more important things than arithmetic.

Every now and then when we do a numerical problem in one of my physics classes (I'll be a senior now), it comes to multiplying something non-trivial and the class gets a collective brain-fart and it takes us like 5 minutes to do any adding or multiplying, even the professor gets stuck.

Don't worry about it. Calculus is more important than arithmetic.
 
Agreed with WarPhalange. How quickly you can do mental arithmetic does not measure how you'll do in upper level math courses.

You need to know how to think abstractly, grasp concepts, and be creative, not multiply 323.43*45.7 in your head.
 
Don't worry--even some of the math professors can get those wrong during lectures. I remember a few times in number theory when my professor said 56 is 7 mod 2, implying that if you divide 56 by 7, you get a remainder of 2. It took a few seconds for a class to realize the fallacy in his statement, and it was actually funny because somebody who can do algebraic topology can still get the multiplication table wrong.

But as I've said, it was actually "funny", and nobody thought it was ridiculous or crazy (e.g. "OMG, he can't do multiplication and he's our professor!"). The upper division math classes stresses on understanding abstract concepts rather than being able to compute arithmetic quickly. People won't look down on you for not getting correct arithmetic, except for some misguided people who THINK math is all about arithmetic (but we all have to deal with these people in different way).
 
PieceOfPi said:
... People won't look down on you for not getting correct arithmetic, except for some misguided people who THINK math is all about arithmetic (but we all have to deal with these people in different way).

That's the worst part of telling people I'm a math major. I'm the first one asked when big number arithmetic needs to be done.
 
alligatorman said:
you Need To Know How To Think Abstractly, Grasp Concepts, And Be Creative, Not Multiply 323.43*45.7 In Your Head.

14780.751

edit: that's weird. For an exercise in being creative, anyone want to conjecture why that quote altered the capitalization at the beginning of each word?
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
822
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top