MHB Is the Product of Two Integers Greater Than 10^2009? Let's Prove It!

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Product
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the expression 3^{4^5} + 4^{5^6} can be expressed as the product of two integers, each greater than 10^{2009}. Participants clarify the correct interpretation of the exponents, emphasizing that 3^{4^5} equals 3^{1024} and 4^{5^6} equals 4^{15625}. Misunderstandings regarding the exponential notation are addressed, with participants correcting each other on the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate exponent reading in mathematical proofs. The thread concludes with acknowledgments of contributions and corrections made by various users.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that $\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers, each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
$\large 3^{4^5}=3^{1024}$
$\large 4^{5^6}=4^{15625}=(3+1)^{1024}\times 4^{14601}$
using binomial expansion the first part is done
 
Last edited:
Hello, Albert!

Prove that $3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}$ is the product of two integers,
each at least $\large 10^{2009}$.
You are misreading the exponents.

In an exponential "stack",
. . we read from the top down.

. . 3^{4^5} \;=\;3^{1024}

. . 4^{5^6} \;=\;4^{15,625}However: .(3^4)^5 \;=\;8^4\:\text{ and }\: (4^5)^6 \:=\:1024^6
 
thanks soroban , in a haste I made a mistake in misreading the exponent :o

now the solution is as follows :

$(3^{512})^2+(2^{15625})^2---(1)$
let $a=3^{512}, b=2^{15625}$
(1) becomes $(a+b)^2 -2ab=(a+b)^2 -[(3^{256}\times 2^{7813})]^2=(x+y)(x-y)$
$here \,\, x=a+b, y=(3^{256}\times 2^{7813}) $
the rest is easy:
we only have to compare x-y and $10^{2009}$(compare digit numbers of both values)
I only count them roughly
$15625\times log 2>15625\times 0.3>4687>2009$
$256\times log 3+7813\times log 2>102+2343$
4687-102-2343=2242>2009
$\therefore x-y >10^{2009}$
and the proof is finished
 
Last edited:
soroban said:
Hello, Albert!


You are misreading the exponents.

In an exponential "stack",
. . we read from the top down.

. . 3^{4^5} \;=\;3^{1024}

. . 4^{5^6} \;=\;4^{15,625}However: .(3^4)^5 \;=\;8^4\:\text{ and }\: (4^5)^6 \:=\:1024^6

Hi soroban,

Thanks for helping me to let Albert know that a misreading has occurred and that he has the chance to fix things right.:)

Albert said:
thanks soroban , in a haste I made a mistake in misreading the exponent :o

now the solution is as follows :

$(3^{512})^2+(2^{15625})^2---(1)$
let $a=3^{512}, b=2^{15625}$
(1) becomes $(a+b)^2 -2ab=(a+b)^2 -[(3^{256}\times 2^{7813})]^2=(x+y)(x-y)$
$here \,\, x=a+b, y=(3^{256}\times 2^{7813}) $
the rest is easy:
we only have to compare x-y and $10^{2009}$(compare digit numbers of both values)
I only count them roughly
$15625\times log 2>15625\times 0.3>4687>2009$
$256\times log 3+7813\times log 2>102+2343$
4687-102-2343=2242>2009
$\therefore x-y >10^{2009}$
and the proof is finished

Thanks Albert for participating and your solution as well!

Suggested solution by Pedro and Alex:

Let $m=3^{256}$ and $k=4^{3906}$. Then

$\begin{align*}\large 3^{4^5}+4^{5^6}&=m^4+4k^4\\&=(m^4+4m^2k^2+4k^4)-4m^2k^2\\&=(m^2+2mk+2k^2)(m^2-2mk+2k^2)\end{align*}$

Notice that $m^2+2mk+2k^2>m^2-2mk+2k^2>2k^2-2mk=2k(k-m)>k>2^{7800}>(10^3)^{780}>10^{2009}$.

The result is then follows.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top