Product rule in Newton notation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct representation of the product rule in Newton notation involves using dots above the variables. Specifically, for the expression d/dt(xy), the product rule is expressed as d(xy)/dt = dx/dt · y + x · dy/dt, which translates to \dot{x} · y + x · \dot{y}. It is recommended to use (xy)' instead of a single dot above the entire expression, as the latter can lead to confusion and misinterpretation. Clarity in notation is essential, particularly when dealing with multiple variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton notation and Leibniz notation
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts, specifically the product rule
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation clearly
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Newton and Leibniz notation in calculus
  • Study advanced differentiation techniques, including higher-order derivatives
  • Explore best practices for mathematical notation to enhance clarity
  • Learn about common pitfalls in interpreting mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who require a clear understanding of differentiation and mathematical notation.

volican
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
What is the correct way to write the product rule in Newton notation (with the dots above)? It is the LHS I am abit confused with. Eg. Say you have d/dt(xy) would you just put dots above the x and y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
## \stackrel{\cdotp}{(xy)} ## but in this case it would definitely be better to write ##(xy)'## instead.
##\stackrel{\cdotp}{x}\stackrel{\cdotp}{y}## would mean ##\frac{d}{dt}x \cdot \frac{d}{dt}y\,.##
 
Thanks. Why would (xy)' be better to use than the (xy) with a single dot above? In the equation I am working with I have just used all dots, would it be ok to include a single (xy)' ?
 
In this case stay with the dots or use the Leibniz notation everywhere. The dot over more than one variable is simply hard to read. E.g. it could be mistaken by a failure in paper, or just be overlooked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K