Products of Glucose Degradation in HCl Solution

Thread starter Hootenanny
Start date Mar 1, 2006
Tags

Glucose

AI Thread Summary

The degradation of glucose in HCl solution can lead to various products, including 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), furfural, and other organic acids. The concentration of HCl affects the reaction pathway and the types of degradation products formed. At higher concentrations, the reaction may yield more complex compounds due to increased hydrolysis and dehydration reactions. The timeframe for these reactions can vary, impacting the overall yield of specific products. Understanding these degradation pathways is crucial for accurate reporting in scientific contexts.

Mar 1, 2006

Hootenanny

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Does anybody know the possible products of the degredation of Glucose, more specifically in a solution of HCl (0.1-2 mol.dm^-3)? I've tried searching on the internet but caanot find any specifics.

Thank's in advance.

Physics news on Phys.org

Mar 1, 2006

Hootenanny

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Anybody please? I'm under a bit of time pressure hear because my report is due in on friday.

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »