Programming Languages used in Graduate School? (quantum, high energy, and nuclear physics)

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a user seeks advice on the most commonly used programming languages in graduate school, particularly in the fields of quantum, high energy, and nuclear physics. They emphasize the importance of learning programming concepts over focusing on specific languages. A recurring theme is the observation that many physicists have learned outdated languages like Fortran 77 without acquiring essential programming skills, such as writing clear code or using debugging tools effectively. The conversation highlights the necessity of mastering debugging techniques, citing personal experiences to stress the importance of being proficient in tools like gdb, which can be crucial in advanced programming scenarios.
Jose Diaz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have 1 undergrad year left and was wondering what the most used programming languages in grad school are. I still don't know which grad school will accept me so I haven't bothered to ask them directly as my application will be in November when I get my GRE scores.
I am Interested in quantum, high energy, and nuclear physics.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is better to learn to program than any specific language.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
It is better to learn to program than any specific language.
And in my somewhat limited experience, based on members at this site, many folks of the physicist sort learned a specific language (Fortran 77), but did not learn how to program -- just enough to get by without any fancy additions like learning how to write code that others could easily understand, or how to use a debugger.
 
Mark44 said:
how to use a debugger.
This. Don't be a dummy like me and use C/C++ for a decade without learning how to use gdb. You won't need it, until you really do.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top