Progress on M Theory: What We Know So Far

[PAllen]

I am interested in what progress has been made understanding what M Theory is, what it's nature might be beyond dualities between partial theories, and any ideas about what types of phenomenon it might predict, beyond the partial theories.

I would rather any discussions of plausibitlity of M theory, judgements compared to other theories, etc. *not* be part of this thread. I'm hoping for a neutral thread on progress specifically on M-theory as unified theory of particles and forces including gravity, as distinct from general success of 'stringy approaches' or progress on any of the 5 component string theoroies+supergravity (unless one of these is giving a clue as to the nature of M Theory).

 

[atyy]

tom.stoer just had a long thread on this. It seemed as if it was all very technical small steps and nothing available for the layman. The only thing I came across was http://www.blau.itp.unibe.ch/stqg.pdf , where at the end they say " In particular a non-perturbative formulation of the theory and uncovering its symmetries are important open issues. Matrix models and AdS/CFT correspondence mark recent success on the former issue, while hyperbolic Kac–Moody algebras might be the right language for the latter." But that's probably just their personal view at least for the latter, since I don't see many people working on it.

 

[tom.stoer]

Two warnings: we have to distinguish between M-theory in the sense of M2/M5 branes (which is one specific theory) and M-theory as the mother-theory (which seems to be still unknown); the referenc you give seems pretty nice, but afaik the two guys are not really string experts.

 

[atyy]

Two warnings: we have to distinguish between M-theory in the sense of M2/M5 branes (which is one specific theory) and M-theory as the mother-theory (which seems to be still unknown); the referenc you give seems pretty nice, but afaik the two guys are not really string experts.

Also, what I don't understasnd about the Kac-Moody stuff is: is there any evidence this holds away from a spacelike singularity?