Projectile acceleration in barrel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of achieving a desired muzzle velocity of 300 m/s for a pneumatic airgun using a 0.2 gram BB. The calculations suggest that maintaining a pressure of 31 bar results in impractically long barrel lengths, with initial estimates reaching over 5 meters. Key issues identified include the pressure behind the BB not instantaneously reaching 31 bar and the increasing volume behind the BB as it travels down the barrel. The conversation shifts to considering energy rather than just acceleration, with calculations indicating that a barrel length of around 21.2 cm could be sufficient if the pressure is maintained effectively. The participants emphasize the need for more pressure and the potential use of CO2 as a propellant for better efficiency.
cheekibreeki
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Another gun-related question:

I'm building a pneumatic airgun and I'm trying to find out what pressure/barrel length I have to use for a given muzzle velocity. I've done a bit of number crunching but I keep coming up with insane barrel lenghts, and that's not even considering any friction. Here's what I did:

I want to accelerate a 0.2 gram 6mm bb to a velocity of 300m/s using compressed air.

I take a pressure difference of 30 bar (3,0 * 10^6 Pa) so a total pressure of 31 bar and a surface area of 2.83 * 10^ -4 m^2. P = F/A, therefore F = PA

3 * 10^6 * 2.83 * 10^ -4 = 84,9N, so when I initially pull the trigger the air pressure is pushing my bb forward with 84,9N of force. If the pressure behind the bb at the moment I pull the trigger is 31 bar and at the moment it exits the barrel is 1 bar, this leaves me with an average force of 84.9/2 = 42,45N.

a = F/M (where a = acceleration), F is 42.45 and M = 2 * 10^ -4, 42.45/2 * 10^ -4 = 212250 m/s^2

At that rate of acceleration, my bb reaches 300 m/s after accelerating for 0.0376 seconds. The thing is, by then it has already traveled 300/2 * 0.0376 = 5.64 meters, which is a bit unpractical.

Modern air rifles use a lot less air to accelerate much heavier projectiles to similar velocities with 50/60cm barrels.

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for one thing, even if your receiver is charged up to 31 bar, the pressure behind the bb will not instantaneously jump to 31 bar.

Secondly, as the bb moves down the barrel, the volume behind the bb is constantly increasing. You can't expect to keep a steady 31 bar in that volume at all times.

You need to give some thought to the fluid flow problem here.

I did not check your numbers; there could be other errors as well, but the one above strikes me as the big one.
 
it might help to think in terms of energy instead of acceleration and time.
.2 grams = .0002kg
KE=1/2mv2 so...
(3002)(.0002)(1/2)=9 Joules
Joules = force * distance so...
9=42.45x where x is the length of the barrel, so, about 4.7 meters

clearly you need more pressure. CO2 is a commonly used propellant and has a vapor pressure of 60 bar at 22 degrees C. If that pressure were maintained over the length of the barrel it would be more like 1.2 meters.
 
  • Like
Likes cheekibreeki
mrspeedybob said:
it might help to think in terms of energy instead of acceleration and time.
.2 grams = .0002kg
KE=1/2mv2 so...
(3002)(.0002)(1/2)=9 Joules
Joules = force * distance so...
9=42.45x where x is the length of the barrel, so, about 4.7 meters

clearly you need more pressure. CO2 is a commonly used propellant and has a vapor pressure of 60 bar at 22 degrees C. If that pressure were maintained over the length of the barrel it would be more like 1.2 meters.

How did you get those numbers? if E = F * S then 9 = 42.45 * x, then 42.45x = 9, then x = 9/42.45, x = 0.212. According to that formula the length of the barrel should be only 21.2 cm instead of 4.7 meters. ?
 
cheekibreeki said:
At that rate of acceleration, my bb reaches 300 m/s after accelerating for 0.0376 seconds. The thing is, by then it has already traveled 300/2 * 0.0376 = 5.64 meters, which is a bit unpractical.

Modern air rifles use a lot less air to accelerate much heavier projectiles to similar velocities with 50/60cm barrels.

That's nearly Mach 1. Can that possibly be correct? You can see the pellet as it goes away from you, unlike a .22 rifle bullet.
The limit for the energy of a legal air gun is only 12ft lbs, affair
 
sophiecentaur said:
That's nearly Mach 1. Can that possibly be correct? You can see the pellet as it goes away from you, unlike a .22 rifle bullet.
The limit for the energy of a legal air gun is only 12ft lbs, affair

Actually, there is no legal limit here in the Netherlands. And yes, using an airSOFT gun, which generally shoot around 70-120m/s, you can see the bb fly away, but I'm not building an airsoft gun. I'm building an air rifle, 6mm is just for the concept gun.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top