Projectile Launched from Moon: Altitude for 3/4 Speed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a projectile launched vertically from the Moon's surface with an initial speed of 1210 m/s, and participants are tasked with determining the altitude at which the projectile's speed is three-fourths of its initial value. The context is rooted in the principles of conservation of energy and gravitational effects specific to the Moon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy, with one suggesting a specific energy equation. There are questions about the accuracy of gravitational acceleration on the Moon and its implications for the calculations. Some participants express confusion over algebraic manipulations and numerical results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the use of gravitational constants specific to the Moon and exploring different interpretations of the energy conservation equation. There is no explicit consensus on the correct altitude, and multiple numerical results are being debated.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using the correct value of gravitational acceleration for the Moon, which is different from Earth's, and there is some uncertainty regarding the exact value to use. Additionally, there is mention of assumptions related to the use of energy equations.

tgvaughn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A projectile is launched vertically from the surface of the Moon with an initial speed of 1210 m/s. At what altitude is the projectile's speed three-fourths its initial value?

can someone please help me with this! i keep getting 1.96x10^5 m but it says that is not the correct answer

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should really be in the hwk section. However, yes, your answer is incorrect. Think of it this way:

[itex]\frac{1}{2}mv_1^2=\frac{1}{2}m (\frac{3v_1}{4})^2+mgh[/itex] (assuming you're allowed to use mgh). I assume you've covered conservation of energy (or are you still only doing kinematics)?
 
yes we have covered conservation of energy. however when i solve using this equation i get the answer 195885, which is the same thing as 1.96x10^5 right?
 
Well you're making an algebraic mistake somewhere. I'm getting 3.3x10^4
 
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?

1.63 m/s^2
 
HallsofIvy said:
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?

More precisely, an unconfirmed source says 1.62631, but I haven't done the calculation or found corroboration--but it's close enough to the approximation I do know that I don't doubt it.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
(assuming you're allowed to use mgh)
You don't need to make an assumption; you can determine this by comparing to the more general expression. However, even if mgh turns out to be a good approximation, you might as well use the more general expression to begin with: U=GMm/r^2.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
This should really be in the hwk section. However, yes, your answer is incorrect. Think of it this way:

[itex]\frac{1}{2}mv_1^2=\frac{1}{2}m (\frac{3v_1}{4})^2+mgh[/itex] (assuming you're allowed to use mgh). I assume you've covered conservation of energy (or are you still only doing kinematics)?

once i learned the conservation of energy...physics became a whole lot easier coz i could basically solve almost all problems using a few basic energy equations...instead of kinematics...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K