Projectile Launched from Moon: Altitude for 3/4 Speed

tgvaughn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A projectile is launched vertically from the surface of the Moon with an initial speed of 1210 m/s. At what altitude is the projectile's speed three-fourths its initial value?

can someone please help me with this! i keep getting 1.96x10^5 m but it says that is not the correct answer

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should really be in the hwk section. However, yes, your answer is incorrect. Think of it this way:

[itex]\frac{1}{2}mv_1^2=\frac{1}{2}m (\frac{3v_1}{4})^2+mgh[/itex] (assuming you're allowed to use mgh). I assume you've covered conservation of energy (or are you still only doing kinematics)?
 
yes we have covered conservation of energy. however when i solve using this equation i get the answer 195885, which is the same thing as 1.96x10^5 right?
 
Well you're making an algebraic mistake somewhere. I'm getting 3.3x10^4
 
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?

1.63 m/s^2
 
HallsofIvy said:
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?

More precisely, an unconfirmed source says 1.62631, but I haven't done the calculation or found corroboration--but it's close enough to the approximation I do know that I don't doubt it.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
(assuming you're allowed to use mgh)
You don't need to make an assumption; you can determine this by comparing to the more general expression. However, even if mgh turns out to be a good approximation, you might as well use the more general expression to begin with: U=GMm/r^2.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
This should really be in the hwk section. However, yes, your answer is incorrect. Think of it this way:

[itex]\frac{1}{2}mv_1^2=\frac{1}{2}m (\frac{3v_1}{4})^2+mgh[/itex] (assuming you're allowed to use mgh). I assume you've covered conservation of energy (or are you still only doing kinematics)?

once i learned the conservation of energy...physics became a whole lot easier coz i could basically solve almost all problems using a few basic energy equations...instead of kinematics...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
28K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K