Projectile Launched from Moon: Altitude for 3/4 Speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A projectile launched vertically from the Moon's surface at an initial speed of 1210 m/s reaches three-fourths of its initial speed at an altitude calculated using the conservation of energy principle. The correct gravitational acceleration on the Moon is approximately 1.63 m/s², not the Earth’s 9.81 m/s². The energy conservation equation used is 1/2 mv_1^2 = 1/2 m (3v_1/4)^2 + mgh, which simplifies to find the altitude. The correct altitude is approximately 33,000 meters, not 196,000 meters as initially calculated by some participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration values, specifically for the Moon
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Basic knowledge of projectile motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in gravitational fields
  • Learn how to calculate gravitational acceleration for different celestial bodies
  • Explore the implications of using different gravitational constants in physics problems
  • Practice solving projectile motion problems using energy methods
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching projectile motion and energy conservation, and anyone interested in celestial mechanics and gravitational effects on projectiles.

tgvaughn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A projectile is launched vertically from the surface of the Moon with an initial speed of 1210 m/s. At what altitude is the projectile's speed three-fourths its initial value?

can someone please help me with this! i keep getting 1.96x10^5 m but it says that is not the correct answer

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should really be in the hwk section. However, yes, your answer is incorrect. Think of it this way:

\frac{1}{2}mv_1^2=\frac{1}{2}m (\frac{3v_1}{4})^2+mgh (assuming you're allowed to use mgh). I assume you've covered conservation of energy (or are you still only doing kinematics)?
 
yes we have covered conservation of energy. however when i solve using this equation i get the answer 195885, which is the same thing as 1.96x10^5 right?
 
Well you're making an algebraic mistake somewhere. I'm getting 3.3x10^4
 
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?

1.63 m/s^2
 
HallsofIvy said:
And, of course, since we are talking about the moon and not the earth, you have to use the value of "g" that is correct for the moon, not 9.81 m/s2.

What is that "g"?

More precisely, an unconfirmed source says 1.62631, but I haven't done the calculation or found corroboration--but it's close enough to the approximation I do know that I don't doubt it.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
(assuming you're allowed to use mgh)
You don't need to make an assumption; you can determine this by comparing to the more general expression. However, even if mgh turns out to be a good approximation, you might as well use the more general expression to begin with: U=GMm/r^2.
 
maverick_starstrider said:
This should really be in the hwk section. However, yes, your answer is incorrect. Think of it this way:

\frac{1}{2}mv_1^2=\frac{1}{2}m (\frac{3v_1}{4})^2+mgh (assuming you're allowed to use mgh). I assume you've covered conservation of energy (or are you still only doing kinematics)?

once i learned the conservation of energy...physics became a whole lot easier coz i could basically solve almost all problems using a few basic energy equations...instead of kinematics...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K