Projectile Motion baseball hit question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the initial velocity of a baseball hit at an angle of 35 degrees, which clears a wall 21.0 meters high located 130 meters from home plate. The equations derived include horizontal and vertical motion equations, with the vertical acceleration set at -9.81 m/s². The key equations used are v0 cos(35)t = 130 for horizontal motion and 1 + v0 sin(35)t - 4.9t² = 21 for vertical motion, allowing for the simultaneous solution of initial velocity (v0) and time (t).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for motion
  • Basic algebra for solving simultaneous equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations
  • Learn how to solve simultaneous equations in physics
  • Explore the effects of different launch angles on projectile trajectories
  • Investigate the role of initial height in projectile motion calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone interested in applying mathematical concepts to real-world scenarios involving sports physics.

pulau_tiga
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
can you please help me with this question. I really am stumped, on how to get the initial velocity.

A ball player hits a home run and the baseball just clears a wall 21.0 m high located 130 m from home plate. (assume max height of the ball is 21.0 m) The ball is hit at an angel of 35.0* to the horizontal at a height of 1.0 m.
a) What is the initial velocity of the ball?
b) how much time does it take the ball to reach the wall?
c) Find the veolicty components and the velocity of the ball when it reaches the wall.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pulau_tiga!

Welcome to the forums!

Can you post what you've tried so far, even if it's just looking up the relevant formulas?

You won't learn it if we do the problem for you.
 
Okay.
I know that a=-9.8 m/s; and d= 20.m
but I don't know if Vf = 0... I think it might, but I'm not sure.
If it does = 0 then I think I can do...
Vf2 = Vi2 +2ad
0 = Vi2 +2ad
-2ad = Vi2
-2(-9.8)(20.) = Vi2
390 m2/s2 = Vi2
Vi=20. m/s
but I don't know if Vf = 0 or not.
my answer seems reasonable, so that seems possible to me.
 
No, it is not necessary that vf be 0. If we assume that the ball is at its highest point when it passes the wall that would be true but you can't assume that. By the way, did you use the fact that the initial angle is 35 degrees?

Unfortunately, I don't know what formulas you have available to use.

Here's how I would do the problem.

Calling the initial speed v0, we know that the initial "velocity vector" was (v0 cos(35), v0 sin(35))- that is, that the initial horizontal speed was v0 cos(35) and the initial vertical speed was v0 sin(35). We also know that the horizontal acceleration is 0 and that the vertical acceleration is -9.81 m/s^2.

From that, we can get that the horizontal speed at any time, t seconds, is v0 cos(35) (no acceleration so it doesn't change) and that the vertical speed at time t is vo sin(35)- 9.81t.

From that, we can get that the horizontal position at any time, t seconds, is vo cos(35)t and that the vertical position at time t is
1+ vo sin(35)t- 4.9 t^2 (That "1" is the initial height).

Since the wall is 130 m horizontally and 21 m high, and the ball "just cleared" the fence, at that time we must have
v0 cos(35)t= 130 and 1+ v0 sin(35)t- 4.9t^2= 21.

You can solve those two equations for v0 and t.
 
Hello, I am having trouble with this same exact question.
I read this topic fully and I do not get it.
The person gave two equations having two unkown variables, initial velocity and time in order to find time and initial velocity. How is this possible?
Can someone explain this in...eh...easier terms?
:rolleyes:

Thanks,
Brandon
 
Also...where did the 4.9 come from in that one equation... :confused:
 
Brando05 said:
Also...where did the 4.9 come from in that one equation... :confused:

OK, so 4.9 is half of 9.81... :approve:
 
hehehe, that was a dozy 9.8/2=4.9. Whew. :-p
jk
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
5K