Projectile motion of a thrown rock

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the height of a cliff from which a rock is thrown at an initial velocity of 25.0 m/s at an angle of 40.0 degrees. The rock hits the ground after 3.75 seconds, and the correct height of the cliff is determined to be approximately 141 meters. Participants emphasized the importance of correctly resolving the initial velocity into vertical and horizontal components, with vertical velocity calculated as 19.15 m/s. The kinematic equation used to find the height is y = v0yt + 0.5at², confirming the solution through algebraic manipulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Ability to resolve vectors into components
  • Familiarity with projectile motion concepts
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in projectile motion
  • Learn how to resolve vectors into their components using trigonometric functions
  • Explore the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
  • Practice solving similar problems involving projectile motion and cliff heights
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding projectile motion and its applications in real-world scenarios.

Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A hiker throws a stone from the upper edge of a vertical cliff. The stone ' s initial velocity is 25.0 m/s directed at 40.0 degrees with the face of the cliff, as shown in Fig. 3.1. The stone hits the ground 3.75 s after being thrown and feels no appreciable air resistance as it falls. the height of the cliff is closest to

Here is the link to the picture: http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8058/58525486.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So what I first did was break the velocity into its vertical and horizontal components,

25.0sin40=16.06m/s(y0)

25.0cos40=19.15m/s(x0)

We know the time it takes to hit the gound is 3.75 seconds

I got its Vy( final velocity) by using the following equation vy=vosina-gt

vy=16.0sin40-9.8(3.75s)
=-26.46m/s

Here is where I start getting lost, I wanted to solve for deltay using the following formula;

vf^2=vi^2+2aDeltay

(-24.46)^2-(16.06)^2/2(-9.8).. and I got some funky answer, the answer to the problem is 141.

Can someone walk me through how to get that answer, thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well to start off 25sin40 is the x component of the velocity, not the y, assuming theta is the angle between the vertical cliff face and the direction the stone was thrown, although I could just be reading it wrong, the picture is open to interpretation...

Your kinematics equations are fine, it looks like a simple error in your algebra as long as the above error is irrelevant.

Additionally, what are you solving for?
 
Sorry I edited it, we are solving for the height of the cliff.
 
Mdhiggenz said:
Sorry I edited it, we are solving for the height of the cliff.

Check your algebra, and trig. Again, I don't think your angle is in the right spot. I solved it and got the correct answer.

Your kinematics equations themselves are fine.
 
I tried 25cos40=v0y=19.15

y=19.15(3.75)-1/2(-9.8)(3.75)^2=141!

Thank you!

Can You walk me through your thought process when you were solving this problem?
 
Mdhiggenz said:
I tried 25cos40=v0y=19.15

y=19.15(3.75)-1/2(-9.8)(3.75)^2=141!

Thank you!

Can You walk me through your thought process when you were solving this problem?

Sure :)

Ok so when I see a kinematics equation the first thing I do is resolve it into components, just as you did. I find that

v0x = 25sin40
v0y = 25cos40

Since we're concerned only with the height of the cliff, and we know the time it takes for it to fall, it becomes quite simple. You can solve one of two ways:

y = y0 + v0yt + .5at2

or solve for the final velocity in the y direction, and then use the time independent kinematics equation (thats the way we both did it, it just occurred to me that the way above works as well, and in one less step!)

Then just solve for x (making sure that your x0 correctly represents the initial position.

Hope this helps! :)
 
Clear explanation, thank you!
 
No problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K