Projectile Motion on a Slope: Calculating Distance Traveled

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lord Anoobis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile Slope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance an arrow travels down a 15-degree slope when shot at a 20-degree angle above the horizontal with an initial speed of 50 m/s from a height of 1.75 m. The key equation used is y = x tan(θ) - (g x²) / (2 v² cos²(θ)), where the archer's height significantly impacts the trajectory. After correcting for the initial height, the calculated distance is approximately 287 m, which aligns closely with the book's answer of 297 m. The importance of accounting for gravitational acceleration and the initial height is emphasized throughout the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving angles and slopes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in inclined planes
  • Learn about the effects of initial height on projectile trajectories
  • Explore the concept of rotating coordinate systems in physics
  • Investigate the impact of gravitational acceleration on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to inclined planes and trajectory calculations.

Lord Anoobis
Messages
131
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


An archer standing on a 15 degree slope shoots an arrow 20 degrees above the horizontal. How far down the slope does the arrow hit if it is shot with a speed of 50m/s from 1.75m above the ground?

Homework Equations


[/B]
##y = x##tan##\theta## - ##\frac{gx^2}{2v^2 cos^2\theta}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I took the slope the archer is standing on to be a line through the origin of the x-y coordinate system, thus intersecting the trajectory of the arrow at two points, one being (0, 0). The slope this line is then

##y = -(tan15^o)x##

Setting the equations equal to each other and punching in values I obtained

##-(tan15^o)x = xtan20^o - \frac{9.8x^2}{5000cos^2 20^o}##

##x = \frac{(tan15^o + tan20^o)(5000cos^2 20^o)}{9.8}##

with x = 284.7 and y = -76.28 giving a final distance of 294.7m. The actual answer is 297m according to the book. I've been over this calculation a few times and it is clear that another set of eyes is required to shed some light on this conundrum. Please assist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you take care of the fact that the arrow is shot from 1.75 m above the ground?
 
A=g.
initial upward velocity = sin(20)*50.
initial y = 1.75
x=cos(20)*50*t
y=-.5*a*t^2+vo*t+yo
yarrow=-.5*9.8*t^2+sin(20)*50*t+1.75

yslope= mx+b
yslope= tan(-15)*x+0
yslope=tan(-15)*cos(20)*50*t

yslope=yarrow
tan(-15 deg)*cos(20 deg)*50*t=-.5*9.8*t^2+sin(20 deg)*50*t+1.75

t=6.118s.
x=cos(20)*50*6.118
x=287

I tried. It's possible the book has a typo.
 
Lord Anoobis said:
I've been over this calculation a few times and it is clear that another set of eyes is required to shed some light on this conundrum. Please assist.
You don't seem to have taken into account the initial height of 1.75 m.

(TSny beat me to it.)
 
TSny said:
Did you take care of the fact that the arrow is shot from 1.75 m above the ground?
It seems I did not, and shifting the curve upward by 1.75m does indeed solve the problem.
Something else though. Initially I thought about rotating the system so that the ground is level and the launch angle is 35 degrees. Am I correct that this would not work? If one considers say, the same 15 degree slope and a launch angle of 75 degrees, rotating would simply send the arrow straight up, not so?
 
Lord Anoobis said:
It seems I did not, and shifting the curve upward by 1.75m does indeed solve the problem.
Something else though. Initially I thought about rotating the system so that the ground is level and the launch angle is 35 degrees. Am I correct that this would not work?

Right. It would not work unless you also rotated the direction of the acceleration of gravity.

If one considers say, the same 15 degree slope and a launch angle of 75 degrees, rotating would simply send the arrow straight up, not so?

That's right (assuming gravity still acts vertically)
 
TSny said:
Right. It would not work unless you also rotated the direction of the acceleration of gravity.
That's right (assuming gravity still acts vertically)
Of course. I didn't consider that, but I can see now that going about it that way wouldn't be simpler at all, seeing that compensating for the direction of gravitational acceleration would result in a horizontal component thereof as well.
Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K