Projectile Motion or Motion in Two dimension

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, where a ball is thrown and caught at different heights and distances. The original poster attempts to calculate the initial speed and angle of the ball based on its trajectory and the time of flight.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster calculates vertical and horizontal components of velocity and questions the assumption that vertical velocity is zero at the point of catching the ball. Other participants challenge this assumption and suggest using a different equation for vertical motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the behavior of the ball at the moment it is caught. Some guidance has been offered on using the correct equations for vertical motion, but there is no explicit consensus on the assumptions being made.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the assumptions related to the highest point of the ball's trajectory and the effects of external forces when the ball is caught. The original poster's calculations are based on a specific interpretation of the problem that may not align with the physics principles being discussed.

Myung
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball is thrown by Jed in the street and caught 2 seconds later by Jelo on the balcony of the house 15m away and 5.0m above the street level. What was the speed of the ball and the angle above the horizontal at which it was thrown?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt for the solution is first get the V(Vertical)

2g(Vertical Max) = Vy^2 - Vyi^2
(Vy at top is 0 so...)
2(-9.8)(5)=-Vyi^2

and i got:
Vyi = 9.9 m/s

Then I want to get my Vxi

Range = Vxi (t)
Vxi = Range / t
Vxi = 15 / 2
Vxi = 7.5 m/s

Vi of the ball = sqrt[(7.5)^2 +(9.9)^2]
Vi = 12.42 m/s

To get angle I used the formula:

Vxi = Vi cos x
x = Cos-1 ( Vxi / Vi )
x = Cos-1 ( 7.5 / 12.42 )
x = 52.85 degrees

Am i doing it right? >.<
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got it half right, but not quite.

If You'll be waiting on a balcony for a ball I'd thrown at you, it wouldn't necessarily arrive at velocity 0, as you suggested. The velocity would only be 0 once you stop it with your hand. But that's another force in action which has nothing to do with the problem. In short - the ball's velocity isn't necessarily 0 once it reaches the balcony.

you know that the initial vertical velocity, v_y, holds this equation:

height of the ball = y(t) = y_0 + v_y*t -0.5gt^2 (here g= 9.8)
(I hope you agree!)

Use the given data of the ball's final height (compared with the streets height) and travel time to get v_y.
The rest of your calculation looks good!
 
Tomer said:
You got it half right, but not quite.

If You'll be waiting on a balcony for a ball I'd thrown at you, it wouldn't necessarily arrive at velocity 0, as you suggested. The velocity would only be 0 once you stop it with your hand. But that's another force in action which has nothing to do with the problem. In short - the ball's velocity isn't necessarily 0 once it reaches the balcony.

you know that the initial vertical velocity, v_y, holds this equation:

height of the ball = y(t) = y_0 + v_y*t -0.5gt^2 (here g= 9.8)
(I hope you agree!)

Use the given data of the ball's final height (compared with the streets height) and travel time to get v_y.
The rest of your calculation looks good!

Uhm, I'm a bit confused.. but in our class we assume that in this kind of problem the ball is always Vy = 0 once it reach the highest.
 
Myung said:
Uhm, I'm a bit confused.. but in our class we assume that in this kind of problem the ball is always Vy = 0 once it reach the highest.

That's not accurate, and I'll give you two counter examples:

1. Who said that the balcony is the highest point on the trajectory of the ball? Imagine the ball traveling on a "rainbow" path, upwards, and then falls back again (while advancing), until it reaches the hands of the guy on the balcony. It could have gone up to 10 meters high, but then, after arriving it's peak height (and zero velocity), it falls downwards towards the balcony.
Do you understand how in this example the velocity of the ball isn't 0? Nobody said the balcony is the highest point of the ball's path.

2. Imagine a guy standing two meters above you. If you throw a ball with a large initial velocity, you can't expect it to have 0 velocity after 2 meters. However, if the guy above you catches the ball, he will inflict another force on it, which will "accelerate" the ball (with a negative sign) until it stops. That's not what they mean by the question - there's that instant moment in which the ball arrives to the guy's hands with a certain velocity, let's say, 4 m/s. Then the ball stops for other reasons (the force inflicted), but not because the ball reached it's maximum height.

I hope these two examples clarify your confusion. You can't assume the ball reached it's highest "potential" height (that means, where he could reach without other forces acting) unless it's stated in the question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K