Projectile Motion - Range of projectile

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically analyzing the range of a projectile fired from a cliff. The first part considers a projectile fired horizontally from a height of 150 m, while the second part involves firing the projectile at a 45° angle above the horizontal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations for both parts of the problem, questioning how to adapt the equations when the projectile is fired at an angle. There is a focus on determining the correct vertical displacement and time of flight for the angled launch.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the same vertical displacement for both scenarios, while others are exploring the implications of the angle on the time of flight and the use of quadratic equations. There is an ongoing examination of the equations needed to solve for time and horizontal range.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the projectile's vertical displacement remains -150 m regardless of the launch angle, and there is a recognition of the need to solve a quadratic equation for time in the angled launch scenario.

coggo8
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My problem consists of two parts, the first being how far from the top of a cliff will a projectile (fired from a cannon) land with a velocity of 120 ms^-1, fired horizontally from cliff height of 150m.
The second part is where I am struggling, the cannon is now aimed 45° above horizontal, how far will the projectile travel now?

Known data for part 1.
Δy = -150
u(y) = 0 ms^-1
a(y) = -9.8 ms^-2
u(x) = 120 ms^-1


Homework Equations



Δy = u(y)*t + 1/2*a(y)*t^2
Δx = u(x)*t

x any y component equations.
u(x) = u*cos(θ)
u(y) = u*sin(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution



Part 1 I found quite simple so hopefully this is correct..

Δy = u(y)*t + 1/2*a(y)*t^2
-150 = 0*t + 1/2(-9.8)*t^2 (substitute above data)
-150 = -4.9*t^2
t^2 = -150/-4.9
t = 5.53 seconds

Δx = u(x)*t
Δx = 120*5.53
Δx = 663.9 m

Part 2.

u(x) = 120*cos(45)
u(x) = 84.85 ms^-1 (2 d.p.)

u(y) = 120*sin(45)
u(y) = 84.85 ms^-1

This is as far I got (finding the x and y components of the initial velocity).
My issue is that I am not sure how to account for the fact that the cannon is elevated 150 m along with the angle change from horizontal to 45°.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you used in Part 1 for ##\Delta y## works in Part 2, too. Except that ##u_y## is not zero in Part 2 (as you have already found).
 
Which of these should the equation look like?
-150 = 84.85*t + 1/2(-9.8)*t^2
or
Δy = 84.85*5.53 + 1/2(-9.8)*(5.53)^2

With the first I have an issue because I am unable to find a value for t and my value for Δy (-150) will also be incorrect as the projectile is now being fired at an angle.
With the second I am using an incorrect value for t as this was the value used for the horizontally fired projectile.
 
The cannon is on the top of the hill at height of 150 m, and its tube is directed at 45°angle. The velocity of the cannon ball has a positive vertical component so it takes longer time to reach the ground as previously, when it was projected horizontally. Determine the time from the equation -150 = 84.85*t + 1/2(-9.8)*t^2. As the cannon is small with respect to the hill you can take Δy=-150 m again.

ehild
 
coggo8 said:
Which of these should the equation look like?
-150 = 84.85*t + 1/2(-9.8)*t^2
or
Δy = 84.85*5.53 + 1/2(-9.8)*(5.53)^2

With the first I have an issue because I am unable to find a value for t and my value for Δy (-150) will also be incorrect as the projectile is now being fired at an angle.

Firing at the angle does not change the vertical displacement. Why are you unable to find a value for t? It is a quadratic equation.
 
voko said:
Firing at the angle does not change the vertical displacement. Why are you unable to find a value for t? It is a quadratic equation.

Of course, I hadn't thought of quadratics (I am just learning kinematics via correspondence). Thank you for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K