Projectile motion with air resistance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a projectile motion problem with air resistance, specifically using Newton's second law and integrating the equations of motion. The drag force is defined as F_r = -alpha * v, where alpha is a positive retarding coefficient. Key results include the horizontal velocity function v_x(t) = v_x0 * e^(-t/tau) and the position function x(t) = tau * v_x0 * (1 - e^(-t/tau)). The participants also explored the vertical motion, deriving the vertical velocity v_y and the time to reach maximum height t_a, ultimately leading to the conclusion that t_a approaches v_y0/g as tau approaches infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's second law of motion
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Concept of exponential decay in physics
  • Basic calculus for integration and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations with air resistance
  • Learn about the effects of drag coefficients on motion
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of varying mass on projectile trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as engineers and researchers dealing with motion in fluid environments.

ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is a standard projectile motion problem, the mass is m, the drag is F_r = - alpha *v, where alpha is a positive retarding coefficient. The origin is the ground and at time t = 0 the horizontal and vertical velocities are positive

a) Write down Newton's second law for the horizontal component of the velocity, v_x (t). Solve for v_x (t) with given initial conditions and use the characteristic time, tau = m/alpha in your answer. Give physical reasoning as to why m increases with tau and why alpha decreases with tau.

b) Integrate v_x (t) from a to determine x(t) with given initial conditions. What is x(t) with the limit t goes to infinity? What would be the horizontal position at t = tau?

c) Convert the DE from a into an equation for v_x (x). Solve for v_x (x) with the given initial conditions and use tau in your answer.

Homework Equations



F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

F_x = m*v'_x = - alpha*v_x

v'_x/v_x = d/dt *ln(v_x) = - alpha * v_x

ln v_x = - alpha/m t + ln v_x0

v_x (t) = v_x0 * e^(-t/tau)

b) I am stuck here, I integrate to get

integral v_x (t) = x(t) = v_x0 *e^(1-t/tau) / (1-t/tau) * A (where A is an arbitrary constant of integration)

But solving for A with the condition that x(t=0) = 0 I get A = 0

c) I am stuck here too,

m dv_x/dx * dx/dt = - alpha * v(t)

I don't know how the convert the second v(t) into a v(x)

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, I'm a little confused. The relation $$dx/dt = v_x = v_{x0} e^{(-t/\tau)}$$ is confirmed. After integral, I got $$x = -\tau v_{x0} e^{(-t/\tau)} + c$$ while c is a constant. Then I can get ##c=\tau v_{x0}##. Does it work?
 
Last edited:
tommyxu3 said:
Hello, I'm a little confused. The relation $$dx/dt = v_x = v_{x0} e^{(-t/\tau)}$$ is confirmed. After integral, I got $$x = -\tau v_{x0} e^{(-t/\tau)} + c$$ while c is a constant. Then I can get ##c=-\tau v_{x0}##. Does it work?
Oh, I see I did the integral wrong, thanks.

But when I put it in for x(t=0) = 0 I get:

0 = - tau *v_x0 * e^(0) + c
c = tau *v_x0

Not c=0, but that is fine.

Can you help me with c)?

Thanks a lot!
 
I typed ##c=0## at first and found it wrong just later and I thought you hadn't seen it yet...
OK, I have corrected it and it should be what you said! :)
$$x =\tau v_{x0}(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})$$
 
For the convert, based on what we have known: $$x =\tau v_{x0}(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}),v_x=v_{x0}e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}} ,$$we can get ##e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}}## in ##x## and let it into ##v_{x}## so we get $$v_x=v_{x0} (1-\frac{x}{\tau v_{x0}}).$$
Does this what the problem require? ##(v_{x0}(x))##
 
I think it expects you arrive at the answer a different way but that is still correct.

There is also other parts to this question

d) Write down the DE for the vertical portion and solve for v_y with the given initial conditions

I got this to be v_y = (v_y0 - g*tau) e^(-t/tau) + g*tau and this is correct.

e) Determine t_a, the time at which the projectile reaches max height. As alpha --> 0, tau --> infinity. Use ln(1+x) = x - x^2/2+... for x<1 to determine lim (tau --> infinity) t_a

For this I set v_y = 0 as it would be at the max time, then rearranged and solved for t:(v_y0 - g*tau) e^(-t/tau) + g*tau = 0

e^(-t/tau) = -g*tau/(v_y0 - g*tau)

t = t_a = -tau ln (-g*tau/(v_y0 - g*tau))

Taking the limit as tau ---> infinity

Using L.H's rule the term inside the ln goes to 1, and thus ln(1) goes to 0 but the tau goes to infinity, so t_a goes to 0. However, I know I messed this up somewhere, can you see my mistake?

f) Determine y(t) by integrating v_y(t). Use the fact that e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2+... to determine lim t-< infinity y(t)

So for the integration I got:

y(t) = tau e^(-t/tau) (g*tau-v_y0)+g*t*tau

Using the property of e^x

tau * e ^ (t/tau) = tau (1 - t/tau + t^2/tau^2) = tau - t + t^2/tau

The last term goes to zero as tau goes to infinity.

So we get

y(t) = (tau - t) (g*tau-v)+gt*tau
= g*tau^2

which goes to infinity.

This is wrong as well but again I am not sure where my mistake is.

Any help would be much appreciated again, thanks a lot!
 
For (d) I got a little difference from yours... mine is $$v_y=(v_{y0}+g\tau)e^{(\frac{-t}{\tau})}-g\tau,$$ but this time I cannot find my wrong turn while yours is correct...
Let me regard yours is correct, and then we get $$v_y=(v_{y0}-g\tau)e^{(\frac{-t}{\tau})}+g\tau.$$Solve t and get $$t_a=-\tau \ln{\frac{g\tau}{-v_{y0}+g\tau}}.$$When ##\tau\rightarrow\infty##, $$t_a=-\ln{(1-\frac{g}{v_{y0}}\tau)^\tau}$$ $$\rightarrow-\ln{e^{\frac{-g}{v_{y0}}}}=\frac{g}{v_{y0}}.$$
So, it may be ##\frac{g}{v_{y0}}.##
 
After I post it, I find it containing lots of errors... Maybe just regard it as reference and let me check again!
 
I got it!
When ##\tau\rightarrow\infty##, $$t_a=\ln{(1-\frac{v_{y0}}{g\tau})^\tau}$$ $$\rightarrow\ln{e^{\frac{v_{y0}}{g}}}=\frac{v_{y0}}{g}.$$
So, it may be ##\frac{v_{y0}}{g}.##
 
  • #10
#7 is apparently absurd. Please ignore it! :p
For your ##y(t)##, I'm not sure if you neglected the constant of integral. I got ##y=\tau(v_{y0}-g\tau)(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})## for ##y_0=0.## Then I can get $$y\approx\tau(v_{y0}-g\tau)(\frac{t}{\tau})+gt\tau=v_{y0}t.$$
 
  • #11
ma18 said:
c) I am stuck here too,

m dv_x/dx * dx/dt = - alpha * v(t)

I don't know how the convert the second v(t) into a v(x)
There's nothing to do. The only difference between v(t) and v(x) is which variable you write the velocity in terms of. Either way, it's the velocity. It's probably just a typo, but it should be ##v_x(t)##, not ##v(t)##, on the righthand side.
 
  • #12
tommyxu3 said:
#7 is apparently absurd. Please ignore it! :p
For your ##y(t)##, I'm not sure if you neglected the constant of integral. I got ##y=\tau(v_{y0}-g\tau)(1-e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})## for ##y_0=0.## Then I can get $$y\approx\tau(v_{y0}-g\tau)(\frac{t}{\tau})+gt\tau=v_{y0}t.$$
How did you arrive at that value for y?

So we have

v_y = (v_y0 - g *tau) e^(-t/tau)+g*tau

Integrating we get

y = - tau * v_y0 * e^(t/tau) + g*tau^2*e^(-t/tau)+gt*tau + C
= tau * e^(-t/tau) (g*tau-v_y0) + gt*tau + C

taking y(t=0) = 0

0 = tau (g*tau-v_y0) + C

=>

C = tau (v_y0 - g*tau)

==>

y = tau*e^(-t/tau) ( g tau - v_y0) + gt tau + tau*v_y0 - g*tau^2
 
  • #13
Yes, I got y for the same way as yours.
Is the relation I wrote what the problem require?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K