MHB Proof by Induction Help: Solving Recursive & Closed Formulas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cribs1420
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equivalence of a recursive formula and its closed form using mathematical induction. The recursive formula given is bk = 3bk-1 + 2 for k < 2, with b1 = 2, while the closed formula is bn = 3n - 1. Participants suggest clarifying the conditions of k, as the usual approach involves k being greater than or equal to 2. The proof process involves establishing a property P(n), proving the base case P(1), and then demonstrating that P(k) leads to P(k+1) for all k ≥ 1. Clear steps and intermediate results are encouraged for those struggling with the proof.
Cribs1420
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am having a heck of a time with this proof. I am given both the recursive and closed formula and am supposed to prove that they are equivalent using induction.

This is what I am given:
bk = 3bk-1+2 for k <2 and b1=2

the closed formula is bn= 3n-1Trying to solve it this is as far as I have gotten...

3m-1 = 3(3(m-1)-1)) +2

I am not sure if this is the correct approach because I am unable to solve it out. Any suggestions on what I should be doing? Thanks a bunch!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure $k \le 2?$ The recurrence relation is solved for the higher term, but if $k \le 2,$ then you'd have to go backwards - quite unusual in recurrence relations.
 
Assuming it's $k\ge 2$, let's go through the whole procedure for proofs by induction.

First, identify a property $P(n)$ concerning which you need to prove "$P(n)$ for all $n\ge1$". Second, write the base case $P(1)$ explicitly (i.e., without using the symbol $P$) and prove it. Third, in the induction step you need to prove that $P(k)$ implies $P(k+1)$ for all $k\ge1$. Towards this proof, you fix an arbitrary $k\ge1$ and assume $P(k)$: this is the induction hypothesis (IH). Write $P(k)$ explicitly and label it as IH. From this hypothesis, you need to prove $P(k+1)$. Write $P(k+1)$ explicitly and indicate that it is what you need to prove (as opposed to the IH, which is assumed). Finally, try deriving the explicit form of $P(k+1)$ from the explicit form of $P(k)$.

If after doing this you have questions, then post the intermediate results of your work.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top