Proof by Induction - Inequalities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving an inequality by induction, with participants providing feedback on the initial approach taken. One user points out that the method used was incorrect, emphasizing the need to start from the assumption that the inequality holds for n=k and to manipulate it towards the desired outcome. Another user clarifies that a specific transformation of the inequality can simplify the proof process, suggesting that fractions can be avoided. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying induction principles and considering alternative strategies for tackling the problem. Overall, the thread serves as a collaborative effort to refine the understanding of proof by induction in the context of inequalities.
odolwa99
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove by induction that: (Please see attachment)

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Can someone please confirm if I have worked the question out correctly. Many thanks.
 

Attachments

  • math (2).jpg
    math (2).jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 480
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is not correct. Start from the inequality you supposed to be true (for n=k) and transform it till you arrive to the desired form. You started from the case n=k+1 and went backwards. That is wrong. ehild
 
It might help you to note that
\frac{1}{(1+r)^n}\le \frac{1}{1+ rn}
is exactly the same as
1+ rn\le (1+ r)^n
so you don't have to worry about the fractions.
 
the second line from the end looks incorrect.
\frac{1}{k\cdot r^2} \le 0 \Leftrightarrow k<0, r\ne 0
why won't you try to attack it from another aspect. for example,
p_1>p2>0 \rightarrow \frac{1}{p_2}>\frac{1}{p_1}
 
Thank you for the help guys. I genuinely appreciate it.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top