Proof by Induction: Sum r=1 to n (3r+1) = n/2(3n+5)

  • Thread starter Thread starter joshd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formula for the sum from r=1 to n of (3r + 1), which equals n/2(3n + 5), using mathematical induction. The base case for n=1 is verified, showing both sides equal 4. The assumption for n=k is established, and the proof for n=k+1 is developed, leading to a simplification that confirms both sides are equal. An alternative approach is suggested, breaking the summation into two parts to utilize known summation formulas. The proof is ultimately confirmed through both methods, demonstrating the validity of the formula.
joshd
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Sum from r=1 to n (3r+1) = n/2(3n+5)Prove true for n=1:
3*1+1=4 | 1/2(3*1+5)=4
Assume true for n=k:
k/2(3k+5)Prove true for n=(k+1):
k/2(3k+5) + (3(k+1)+1) | 1/2(k+1)(3(k+1)+5)
k/2(3k+5) + (3k+3+1) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+3+5)
k/2(3k+5) + (3k+4) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)now what? I can't see what factors I can take out of either to make them the same... any ideas?EDIT: nevermind:

1/2(3k^2+5k+2(3k+4) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)
1/2(3k^2+11k+8) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)
1/2(k+1)(3k+8) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)Same, therefore proved by induction.:D
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
joshd said:
Sum from r=1 to n (3r+1) = n/2(3n+5)Prove true for n=1:
3*1+1=4 | 1/2(3*1+5)=4
Assume true for n=k:
k/2(3k+5)Prove true for n=(k+1):
k/2(3k+5) + (3(k+1)+1) | 1/2(k+1)(3(k+1)+5)
k/2(3k+5) + (3k+3+1) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+3+5)
k/2(3k+5) + (3k+4) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)now what? I can't see what factors I can take out of either to make them the same... any ideas?EDIT: nevermind:

1/2(3k^2+5k+2(3k+4) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)
1/2(3k^2+11k+8) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)
1/2(k+1)(3k+8) | 1/2(k+1)(3k+8)Same, therefore proved by induction.:D
An easier way is to break up the summation like this:
$$\sum_{r = 1}^n (3r + 1) = \sum_{r = 1}^n 3r + \sum_{r = 1}^n 1$$
$$=3\sum_{r = 1}^n r + \sum_{r = 1}^n 1$$
You could then show, by induction, that ##\sum_{r = 1}^n r = \frac {n(n + 1)} 2## and that ##\sum_{r = 1}^n 1 = n##, and use these to complete your proof.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top