Proof: curl curl f = grad (div (f)) - grad^2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter IgorM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Grad Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equation curl curl f = grad (div (f)) - grad^2, with participants suggesting methods involving inner and outer products, specifically the determinant form for the cross product. The conversation highlights the challenges faced when applying curl twice on the left-hand side and emphasizes the utility of index notation for simplification. Additionally, participants inquire about the definition of the Laplace operator as the divergence of the gradient and its limitations with vector functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts, including curl and divergence.
  • Familiarity with inner and outer products in vector analysis.
  • Knowledge of determinant representation for cross products.
  • Proficiency in index notation for simplifying vector equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of curl and divergence in vector fields.
  • Learn about the determinant form of the cross product in vector calculus.
  • Explore index notation and its applications in simplifying vector equations.
  • Research the mathematical foundations of the Laplace operator and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying vector calculus or seeking to deepen their understanding of vector field operations and the Laplace operator.

IgorM
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me proving this:

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/3730/provei.jpg

And just for curiosity, is there a proof for why is the Laplace operator is defined as the divergence (∇·) of the gradient (∇ƒ)?
And why it doesn't work on vetorial function.

Thanks in advance, guys!
Igor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey IgorM and welcome to the forums.

The easiest way I see proving this is to use the definition of the inner and outer products (inner = dot product, outer = cross product).

Use the determinant form for the cross product on the LHS and then expand the RHS and they should come out to the be the same.
 
I got stuck doing this, I tried to use curl twice on the left side to see if It would show as the right side.. but couldn't..

Oh, thanks by the way! =)
 
IgorM said:
I got stuck doing this, I tried to use curl twice on the left side to see if It would show as the right side.. but couldn't..

Oh, thanks by the way! =)

Try evaluating the del x F first using the determinant representation, and then use the result of that and then use del x result to get your final result.

It will probably be a little messy, but it shouldn't take you too long I think to expand out the LHS.
 
This is the result:

î(δyδxF2 - δy²F1 - δz²F1 - δxδzF3) + j(δx²F2 - δxδyF1 - δzδyF3 - δz²F2) + k(δxδzF1 - δx² - δy²F3 - δyδzF2)
 
Anyone?
 
The easiest way is to use index notation I think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K