Mean Value Theorem in Surface Integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Mean Value Theorem in the context of surface integrals, specifically within the framework of vector calculus as presented in H.M. Schey's "Div, Grad, Curl, and All That." The user references the calculation of the integral of a vector field component, F_x, over a small surface area, S1, and highlights the theorem's assertion that this integral can be expressed as the product of the area of S1 and the value of F_x evaluated at a point within S1. The user seeks clarification on the proof and validity of this theorem in relation to surface integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts, particularly surface integrals.
  • Familiarity with the Mean Value Theorem in calculus.
  • Knowledge of divergence and its applications in physics and engineering.
  • Basic proficiency in reading mathematical notation and integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof of the Mean Value Theorem for integrals in multiple dimensions.
  • Study the application of the divergence theorem in vector calculus.
  • Explore examples of surface integrals in physics, particularly in electromagnetism.
  • Learn about the relationship between surface integrals and flux in vector fields.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are studying vector calculus and its applications, particularly those interested in surface integrals and the divergence theorem.

iomtt6076
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Div, Grad Curl, and All That, and in coming up with a formula for the divergence, H.M. Schey starts with a small cube centered at (x,y,z), labels the face parallel to the yz-plane as S1 and calculates

[tex]\int\int_{S_1}\mathbf{F}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{n}}dS=\int\int_{S_1}F_x(x,y,z)dS[/tex]

He then says that because the cube is small, the integral is equal to Fx evaluated at the center of S1 times the area of S1. The justification apparently comes from some mean value theorem that says "the integral of Fx over S1 is equal to the area of S1 multiplied by the function evaluated somewhere on S1."

I tried looking up this theorem to no avail. Could someone point me to a proof or maybe outline why it's true?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at your message, you'll see that the word 'mean value theorem' has become a link. It's essentially the two-dimensional version of
[tex]\exists\ c\,\in\,(a,b): \int_a^b f(t)\ =\ f(c)\,(b\ -\ a)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K