Proof for Closure of Vector Addition - Can You Help?

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
If the tangent space at p is a true vector space, then it must be that the sum of two vectors is itself a directional derivative operator along some path passing through p. I've been trying to prove that this is true without any luck.

My textbook "proves" that vector addition is closed by showing that when the sum of two vectors is applied to the product of two scalar functions, we just get the Leibniz rule. This argument seems really unconvincing to me.

Can anyone either justify the validity of my text's proof, or offer their own proof for the closure of vector addition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
If the tangent space at p is a true vector space, then it must be that the sum of two vectors is itself a directional derivative operator along some path passing through p. I've been trying to prove that this is true without any luck.

My textbook "proves" that vector addition is closed by showing that when the sum of two vectors is applied to the product of two scalar functions, we just get the Leibniz rule. This argument seems really unconvincing to me.

Can anyone either justify the validity of my text's proof, or offer their own proof for the closure of vector addition?

In the book by John Baez and Javier Muniain, "Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity", the authors say that the easiest way to go about it is to start with a vector field, which assigns a vector to each point in spacetime. You can easily(?) prove that vector fields form a vector space, and then (maybe?) the fact for vectors follows.
 
What book are you learning from? The proof you're asking for will be in every textbook on differential topology. If you're learning differential topology from a physics book then my best advice would be to do yourself a favor and learn it from a proper book on the subject. See, for example, section II.5 of "Topology and Geometry"-Bredon (bear in mind this book defines smooth manifolds by using sheafs but it's equivalent to the usual definition in terms of smoothly compatible charts).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top