Proof involving group of permutations of {1,2,3,4}.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof involving the group of permutations of the set {1,2,3,4}. Participants are examining specific elements within this group and exploring the properties of subgroups defined by these elements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find a more efficient method to calculate the expression qkq^{-1} for elements k in set K and q in set Q, rather than checking each element individually.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest focusing on the subgroup generators instead of all elements, indicating a potential productive direction. There is an acknowledgment of the need for justification regarding why checking the generators suffices.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the use of shorthand notation for symmetric groups, which may simplify calculations. There is an emphasis on understanding the relationships between the elements of the groups involved.

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let ##\sigma_4## denote the group of permutations of ##\{1,2,3,4\}## and consider the following elements in ##\sigma_4##:

##x=\bigg(\begin{matrix}1&&2&&3&&4\\2&&1&&4&&3\end{matrix}\bigg);~~~~~~~~~y=\bigg(\begin{matrix}1&&2&&3&&4\\3&&4&&1&&2\end{matrix}\bigg)##
##\sigma=\bigg(\begin{matrix}1&&2&&3&&4\\2&&3&&1&&4\end{matrix}\bigg);~~~~~~~~~\tau=\bigg(\begin{matrix}1&&2&&3&&4\\2&&1&&3&&4\end{matrix}\bigg)##

and put ##K=\{1,x,y,xy\},~~~~~~~ Q=\{1,\sigma,\sigma^2,\tau,\sigma \tau,\sigma^2\tau\}##

Show that if ##q\in Q## and ##k\in K## then ##qkq^{-1}\in K##.

Homework Equations



I have shown ##K## and ##Q## are subgroups of ##\sigma_4## that ##\sigma_4=KQ=\{kq~~;~~k\in K,~q\in Q\}##.

And I have found the following relations: ##x^2=1,y^2=1,yx=xy;~~\sigma^3=1,\tau^2=1,\tau\sigma=\sigma^2\tau##

The Attempt at a Solution



I would go through and calculate ##qkq^{-1}## for each ##k## and each ##q## but I know there must be a shorter way. Do you know of it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just check the relation for the (sub)group generators. You do not need to check every element.
 
Ok thanks. So I only need to calculate ##\sigma x (\sigma)^{-1},~\tau x (\tau)^{-1}, \sigma y (\sigma)^{-1} \text{ and } \tau y (\tau)^{-1}##?
 
Right. You should however think about and convince yourself why this is sufficient as well.
 
Also a personal preference: I would suggest you learn and start using the more short-hand notation for the symmetric groups in terms of cycles. In this notation, your elements would be
$$
x = (12)(34), \ y = (13)(24), \ \sigma = (123), \ \tau = (12).
$$
It really simplifies performing the group multiplications as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K