Proof: Number of different subsets of A is equal to 2^n?

In summary, the conversation discusses proving that the number of subsets of a set with n elements is equal to 2n using mathematical induction. The initial proposition is that a set with a single element has two subsets, and the induction step involves showing that adding another element to a set with k elements results in 2k more subsets. The conversation also touches on the use of binomial coefficients in this proof.
  • #1
218
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if a set a contains n elements, then the number of different subsets of A is equal to 2n.




The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to prove with just combinatorics, where to construct a subset, each element is either in the set or not, leading to 2n subsets. I want to know how to prove it with mathematical induction though. How would I start?

I figured this using summation notation:
[itex]\sum^{k=0}_{n}[/itex] (n k)=2n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
SMA_01 said:

Homework Statement



Prove that if a set a contains n elements, then the number of different subsets of A is equal to 2n.




The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to prove with just combinatorics, where to construct a subset, each element is either in the set or not, leading to 2n subsets. I want to know how to prove it with mathematical induction though. How would I start?

I figured this using summation notation:
[itex]\sum^{k=0}_{n}[/itex] (n k)=2n

So the proposition you want to prove is that the number of subsets of a set with n elements is ##2^n##. Start with ##n=1## A set with a single element, call it ##S_1 = \{a\}## has two subsets: ##\{a\}, \Phi## which is ##2^1##. Now you need to prove the induction step: Assume a set with ##k## elements has ##2^k## subsets and use that to show a set with ##k+1## elements has ##2^{k+1}## subsets. That's how you start. It's easy and you don't need binomial coefficients to do it.
 
  • #3
Thank you. The part with k+1 elements is confusing me. I went through a long process of trying to make one side equal to the other, and it's not really working. :confused:
 
  • #4
If you start with a set with ##k## elements and ##2^k##subsets, and add another element, all the subsets of the original set are subsets of the larger set. What additional subsets are there?
 
  • #5
The additional subsets will be the ones formed using the new element? As if this new element is either in the subsets or not...
 
  • #6
LCKurtz said:
If you start with a set with ##k## elements and ##2^k##subsets, and add another element, all the subsets of the original set are subsets of the larger set. What additional subsets are there?

SMA_01 said:
The additional subsets will be the ones formed using the new element? As if this new element is either in the subsets or not...

Yes, so...?
 
  • #7
So, 2*2^k=2^(k+1), is that right?
 
  • #8
SMA_01 said:
So, 2*2^k=2^(k+1), is that right?

Are you asking me if ##2\cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1}##? Of course, you know it does. Do you understand how to put this all together to make a well written induction proof of your theorem?
 
  • #9
Yes, thank you. I just thought I would have to go through the long, tedious process of proving both sides are equal using the summation formula. Thanks for all your help :approve:
 

Suggested for: Proof: Number of different subsets of A is equal to 2^n?

Replies
3
Views
483
Replies
2
Views
412
Replies
3
Views
194
Replies
9
Views
282
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
649
Back
Top