B Proof of a lemma of BÉZOUT’S THEOREM

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter SamitC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a lemma of Bézout's theorem, stating that if a, b, and c are positive integers with gcd(a, b) = 1 and a divides bc, then a also divides c. The poster expresses confusion regarding the implications of the equation bc/a = s and the relationship between the integers involved. They provide a numerical example with a = 5, b = 3, and c = 10 to illustrate their point, confirming that both 5 divides 30 and 5 divides 10 are true. Ultimately, they realize their misunderstanding about the relationship between the variables and express gratitude for any clarifications. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding divisibility in number theory.
SamitC
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi,
One silly thing is bothering me. As per one lemma, If a, b, and c are positive integers such that gcd(a, b) = 1 and a | bc, then a | c. This is intuitively obvious. i.e.
Since GCD is 1 'a' does not divide 'b'. Now, 'a' divides 'bc' so, 'a' divides 'c'. Proved.

What is bothering me is : suppose bc/a = s. Then as = bc. Thus a = (b/s) c ... (1)
Now, if c/a is an integer so is s/b. Which means b/s is not an integer. Putting this in (1) - how 'a' divides 'c'?
Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
SamitC said:
Which means b/s is not an integer.
So what? Where does b/s appear?

Maybe it is easier to understand with a numerical example:
a=5, b=3, c=10
5 | 30 is true, 5 | 10 is true as well.
bc/a = s gives us s = 30/5 = 6.
s/b=2, and b/s=1/2 is not an integer. So what?
 
  • Like
Likes SamitC
mfb said:
So what? Where does b/s appear?

Maybe it is easier to understand with a numerical example:
a=5, b=3, c=10
5 | 30 is true, 5 | 10 is true as well.
bc/a = s gives us s = 30/5 = 6.
s/b=2, and b/s=1/2 is not an integer. So what?

Thanks for your reply.
Sorry...don't know why i asked this question... a (s/b) = c ...i don't know why I was thinking the other way.
Anyways...thanks
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...