Undergrad Proof of 'Any Finite Dimensional Unitary Space is Complete'?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that any finite dimensional unitary space is indeed complete, as established in the context of Hilbert spaces. A unitary space is defined as a complex vector space equipped with a complex inner product, also referred to as a pre-Hilbert space. The completeness arises from the inner product defining an isometric isomorphism on the respective spaces of ##\mathbb{C}^n## and ##\mathbb{R}^n##. This property is fundamental in functional analysis and is crucial for understanding the structure of finite dimensional spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex vector spaces
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Familiarity with the concepts of isometric isomorphism
  • Basic principles of functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hilbert spaces in detail
  • Explore the concept of isometric isomorphism in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of completeness in functional analysis
  • Investigate examples of finite dimensional unitary spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of Hilbert spaces and unitary spaces will benefit from this discussion.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
In texts treating Hilbert spaces, it's usually given as an example that "any finite dimensional unitary space is complete", but I've found no proof so far and failed prove it myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kent davidge said:
In texts treating Hilbert spaces, it's usually given as an example that "any finite dimensional unitary space is complete", but I've found no proof so far and failed prove it myself.
Unitary means we have a complex (real) vector space with a complex (sesquilinear / real: bilinear) inner product, which is also called a pre-Hilbert space or inner product space. If it is of finite dimension, then we the inner product defines an isometric isomorphism on ##\mathbb{C}^n## (resp. ##\mathbb{R}^n\;##) which is complete.
 
  • Like
Likes mathwonk and PeroK
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K