Proof of Cauchy Sequence Convergence with Subsequence

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a Cauchy sequence of real numbers, which has a convergent subsequence, also converges to the same limit as that subsequence. Participants are exploring the implications of the definitions of Cauchy sequences and convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether the convergence of a subsequence implies the convergence of the entire Cauchy sequence to the same limit. There is mention of a counterexample where a subsequence converges to a limit while the overall sequence does not.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and counterexamples. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between subsequences and convergence, particularly in the context of Cauchy sequences.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the Cauchy property and the nature of subsequences, as well as the need for additional conditions to establish convergence to the same limit.

tarheelborn
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If {s_n} is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers which has a subsequence converging to L, prove that {s_n} itself converges to L.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know that all Cauchy sequences are convergent, and I know that any subsequences of a convergent sequence are convergent to the same limit as the sequence, but I am not sure if I can turn the second part of the statement around to say that if a subsequence is convergent to L, then the sequence converges to the same limit. Any ideas? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tarheelborn said:

Homework Statement



If {s_n} is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers which has a subsequence converging to L, prove that {s_n} itself converges to L.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know that all Cauchy sequences are convergent, and I know that any subsequences of a convergent sequence are convergent to the same limit as the sequence, but I am not sure if I can turn the second part of the statement around to say that if a subsequence is convergent to L, then the sequence converges to the same limit. Any ideas? Thanks.
Actually, you can't just say "if a subsequence converges to L, then the sequence must converge to L". For example, the sequence \{a_n\} with a_n= 1- 1/n for n even and a_n= 1/n for n odd has a subsequence (\{a_n\} for a even) that converges to 1 but the sequence itself does not converges.

What you can say is that if the sequence converges, then because, as you say, all subsequences must converge to that limit, yes, the sequence converges to whatever limit any subsequence converges to. The difference is that you must know the sequence does converge. Which you know here because it is a Cauchy sequence.
 
Well, suppose that the Cauchy sequence converges to a number M different than L. Show that this leads to a contradiction by showing that there exists an epsilon such that some sequence value is always further away from M than epsilon.
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K