Proof of closure under addition and multiplication in a field

Click For Summary
A field is defined as being closed under addition and multiplication, which means that for any two elements a and b in the field, both a + b and ab must also be in the field. The discussion highlights that proving closure depends on the specific set and operations defined as a field. The original poster sought clarification on showing closure for the field of the form Q(√d), where d is a complex number. Participants noted that the approach to proving closure varies based on the nature of d, especially distinguishing between integers and transcendental numbers. Ultimately, the original poster resolved their confusion and completed their assignment.
karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Does anyone know a generic way of showing that a field is closed under multiplication and addition? Please, thanks

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Just need to prove that a+b and ab are in the field that each element a and b are from. Any ideas??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's not really a generic way to do it. It all depends on what set you're claiming is a field. Incidentally, calling it a field before you show it's closed under the operations is bad form.
 
Mystic998 said:
There's not really a generic way to do it. It all depends on what set you're claiming is a field. Incidentally, calling it a field before you show it's closed under the operations is bad form.

The field I am trying to show is a field is of the form Q\sqrt{}d where Q is the set of rational numbers and d is in the set of complex numbers, C.
 
karnten07 said:
Does anyone know a generic way of showing that a field is closed under multiplication and addition? Please, thanks
Yes -- the definition of "field" mandates that it is closed under multiplication and addition.

I suspect you meant to ask something else -- judging by your wording, did you mean to ask about showing whether a subset of a field (with the induced arithmetic operations) is a subfield?
 
Okay, so what you want to do is take arbitrary elements of the field, namely elements of the form a + b\sqrt{d} and c + e\sqrt{d}, with a, b, c, e \in \mathbb{Q}, and show that you get something of that form back when you multiply or add them.
 
As Mystic988 said in the first post, how you show a set if closed under operations (and so is a field) depends on how the set and operations are defined. How you would show that "a field" is of the form Q(\sqrt{d}) where d is a complex number depends upon exactly how "a field" is defined!

Exactly how is your field defined? Mystic988's suggestion is assuming you already know d and want to show that the set of numbers of the form a+ b\sqrt{d} is a field. That is quite correct if d is an integer but if, for example, d is a trancendental number, it is not at all correct.

Again, exactly what is the problem you are working on?
 
HallsofIvy said:
As Mystic988 said in the first post, how you show a set if closed under operations (and so is a field) depends on how the set and operations are defined. How you would show that "a field" is of the form Q(\sqrt{d}) where d is a complex number depends upon exactly how "a field" is defined!

Exactly how is your field defined? Mystic988's suggestion is assuming you already know d and want to show that the set of numbers of the form a+ b\sqrt{d} is a field. That is quite correct if d is an integer but if, for example, d is a trancendental number, it is not at all correct.

Again, exactly what is the problem you are working on?

It's okay, i did the assignment now, i apologise for my poor wording of the question. But i understand how to do the question now, thanks guys
 
Oh, yeah, I was assuming we were talking about quadratic rationals (I think that's the right name. My brain is not functioning fully at this very moment), not more exotic field extensions. Sorry about that.
 
I started to answer the question in exactly the same way!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K