A Proof of covariant derivative of spinor

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of the covariant derivative for spinors using the spin connection and the need for a proof of its covariant transformation. A reference is provided, specifically Weinberg's "Gravitation and Cosmology" (1972), section 12.5, which is suggested as a source for the proof. Participants also engage in a technical exchange regarding specific terms in the proof, particularly the cancellation of the partial mu of S(Λ). The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical details involved in the proof. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on the transformation properties of the covariant derivative for spinors.
baba26
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Looking for a proof that the covariant derivative defined using spin connection transforms as expected.
I have read that we can define covariant derivative for spinors using the spin connection. But I can't see its proof in any textbook. Can anyone point to a reference where it is proved that such a definition indeed transforms covariantly ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
baba26 said:
TL;DR Summary: Looking for a proof that the covariant derivative defined using spin connection transforms as expected.

I have read that we can define covariant derivative for spinors using the spin connection. But I can't see its proof in any textbook. Can anyone point to a reference where it is proved that such a definition indeed transforms covariantly ?
There are many textbook references. One example: Weinberg Gravitation and Cosmology (1972), section 12.5.
 
Does this answer your question, baba26?

Covariant derivative using spin connection 1 of 2.jpg

Covariant derivative using spin connection 2 of 2.jpg
 
@pellis , in the (second)last line of the proof, why did you drop the partial mu of S(Λ) term ? Is it zero for some reason ?
I am talking about the line before "Thus".
 
@baba26 Yes, good that you noticed this, and it does cancel out, as follows:
Covariant derivative using spin connection Reply to query.jpg
 
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...