Proof of exchangeability in matrix multiplications with Identity matrix I

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving a square matrix A and the identity matrix I, specifically focusing on the expression A * (I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1 * A. The context involves matrix operations and properties of inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the properties of matrix inverses and commutativity, questioning whether certain transformations are valid. There are attempts to manipulate the expressions involving A and I-A, with some participants suggesting starting points and others expressing uncertainty about the steps taken.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and suggestions for approaches, including the use of inverses and the properties of matrix multiplication. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to arrive at the desired equality, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the necessity of assuming A is non-singular, while others suggest starting from different expressions to derive the proof. There are references to specific matrix identities and properties that are under consideration.

Crution
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be a square matrix such that I-A is nonsingular.

Prove that A * (I-a)^-1 = (I-A)^-1 * A

Homework Equations



Now I think that

A^-1 * A = A*A^-1 = I
and
I*A = A*I
are relevant for this.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to express (I-a)^-1 in respect to I without having an inversion in it. but somehow I can't get it to work.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this may be a place start... you'll need to assume A is non-singular as well...
[tex](A (I-A)^{-1})^{-1} = ..[/tex]
 
thank you it looks like that might be the way to go.
however, i don't really know where to go from there:

1. Is taking the inverse an equivalent tranformation?
in other words after using

(A*B)^-1 = B^-1 * A^-1

is this correct: (I−A) * A^-1 = A^-1 * (I−A)

2. Where should I go from here?
I'm guessing that I have to transform this further so I can show they are equal by using this formula: A^-1 * A = A * A^-1

But how do I get there?
 
Crution said:
thank you it looks like that might be the way to go.
however, i don't really know where to go from there:

1. Is taking the inverse an equivalent tranformation?
in other words after using

(A*B)^-1 = B^-1 * A^-1
try multplying and see if it behaves an inverse should

[tex](B^{-1} A^{-1})(AB)[/tex]

Crution said:
is this correct: (I−A) * A^-1 = A^-1 * (I−A)

2. Where should I go from here?
I'm guessing that I have to transform this further so I can show they are equal by using this formula: A^-1 * A = A * A^-1

But how do I get there?

Ok so you get
[tex](A (I-A)^{-1})^{-1} = (I−A)A^-1[/tex]

continuing to multiply through and as you suggest using A^-1 * A = A * A^-1 = I
[tex](A (I-A)^{-1})^{-1} = (I−A)A^{-1} = A^{-1}−I = A^{-1}I −A^{-1}A = A^{-1}(I-A)[/tex]

so you have
[tex](A (I-A)^{-1})^{-1} = A^{-1}(I-A)[/tex]

Any ideas where to go from here, think about gettingt back to the LHS in the original question?
 
You don't need to assume A is nonsingular. I would start from A=IA=(I-A)^(-1)(I-A)A. Now show (I-A)A=A(I-A). Continue from there.
 
starting from
[tex](A (I-A)^{-1})^{-1} = A^{-1}(I-A)[/tex]

then I was thinking take the inverse of both sides
[tex]((A (I-A)^{-1})^{-1})^{-1} = (A^{-1}(I-A))^{-1}[/tex]
[tex]A (I-A)^{-1} = (I-A)^{-1}A[/tex]

Though as mentioned this assumes A is non-singular, which may be a leap we don't require. With this in mind I would try Dick's method.. also because he's usually always right about these things.
 
Thank you both for your help!

So if I get this right then Dick suggested to do this:

Since: A = I*A = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A

I can rewrite:A*(I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1*A

(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A

question is, am i allowed to cancel in the following way:

(I-A)^-1*______A_______ = (I-A)^-1*______________A

leaving me with

(I-A)^-1*A = (I-A)^-1*A

That obviously would be great!
 
I can't quite follow your working, isn't your second expression what you are trying to prove?
 
As a start though, why not expand the expression below to show its true
(I-A)A=A(I-A)
 
  • #10
this is similar to noting that the identity matrix always commutes...
 
  • #11
thats what i did:

(I-A)*A=A*(I-A)

(I-A)*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)

What I was trying to ask is: can i do this

(I-A)*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*I = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)*I
 
  • #12
because that would mean I could do this:



A*(I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1*A

(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A

(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)^-1*I = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*I

leaving

(I-A)^-1*A = (I-A)^-1*A

0 = 0
 
  • #13
Crution said:
because that would mean I could do this:



A*(I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1*A

(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)^-1 = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A

(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)^-1*I = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*I

leaving

(I-A)^-1*A = (I-A)^-1*A

0 = 0
still not sure I follow, are you starting by assuming the answer and working back from it? and i can't see how you get from the red and green to the last line, or follow the whole idea...

how about this, you know
[tex](I-A)A = A(I-A)[/tex]

now substitute it on the RHS for (I-A)A in the below expression
[tex]A = (I-A)^{-1}(I-A)A[/tex]

can you take it from here?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
oooh ok, yeah nevermind. thanks for tppinting that out ^^
i just didnt get what you where going for
 
  • #15
man, now i thought i finally had it, but as I'm trying do write it down I can't seem to figure out how to proof (I-A)A=A(I-A) anymore.

I expanded it to (I-A)*(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A = (I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A). But now what?

Ok so overall I will now do this:A=I*A=(I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A

subsitute in

A*(I-A)^-1

= (I-A)^-1*(I-A)*A*(I-A)^-1

because: (I-A)*A=A*(I-A) i can rewrite as

(I-A)^-1*A*(I-A)*(I-A)^-1

which is again: (I-A)^-1*A*I

= (I-A)^-1*A
 
  • #16
yeah ok, so that look good

for (I-A)A=A(I-A) just try multying the expressions out
 
  • #17
(I-A)A = A.I-A.A

then use the fact that the identity commutes
 
  • #18
thank you!
wow I feel stupid.
well

so (I-A)A=A(I-A)

I*A - A2 = A*I - A2
A-A2 = A-A2

alright
thanks for all your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K