Proof of expanding algebraic functions by Puiseux series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of expanding algebraic functions using Puiseux series, specifically the representation of functions w(z) defined by the equation f(w,z)=a_n(z)w^n+a_{n-1}(z)w^{n-1}+\cdots+a_0(z)=0. Participants emphasize the importance of expressing w(z) as a fractional power series: w(z)=∑(n=-∞ to ∞) a_n (z^{1/d})^n. The conversation highlights the need for accessible references and methods to demonstrate the existence and convergence of such power series representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with Puiseux series
  • Knowledge of power series convergence
  • Basic skills in manipulating algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof of the existence of Puiseux series in algebraic geometry
  • Study convergence criteria for power series
  • Explore the application of fractional power series in algebraic functions
  • Investigate references on algebraic functions and their expansions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraic geometers, and students studying algebraic functions and series expansions will benefit from this discussion.

jackmell
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
54
Hi,

I'm told that a basic result in algebraic geometry is that all algebraic functions w(z) of one variable given by the equation:

f(w,z)=a_n(z)w^n+a_{n-1}(z)w^{n-1}+\cdots+a_0(z)=0

can be written in terms of fractional power series of the form:

w(z)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}a_n \left(z^{1/d}\right)^n

Might someone here suggest an accessible reference that goes over the proof or perhaps take a moment to explain some of the basic ideas behind the proof to me?

Thanks,
Jack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My gut feeling is just set d=n! (or to the lcm of 1, 2, .., n), plug in, and show that you can solve for the coefficients.
 
Hurkyl said:
My gut feeling is just set d=n! (or to the lcm of 1, 2, .., n), plug in, and show that you can solve for the coefficients.

Afraid I don't follow that Hurkyl. My main question is how do I show the existence of such a power series representation and then show that it actually converges to the function in the specified domain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K