How Can You Prove Famous Mathematical Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dafe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
Resources for proving famous mathematical equations include Wikipedia, which provides foundational information but lacks detailed proof steps. The discussion highlights the importance of self-proving equations for deeper understanding. A recommended resource is "God Created the Integers" by Stephen Hawking, which explores significant mathematical discoveries and profiles influential mathematicians. This book offers insights into landmark contributions to mathematics over the last 2,500 years. Engaging with these resources can enhance comprehension of famous equations.
Dafe
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Proof of "famous" equations.

Hey, I'm wondering if there is a good resource with proofs of famous equations just like the title says :)

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you consider "famous" equations?
 
I quess the same ones as you do.
 
IMHO, Wikipedia is a great source because it gives you what you need to get to certain equations, but doesn't give you the steps in between--you can prove them yourself. I feel Wiki is accurate enough for math, maybe not for other subjects.
 
How about "God created the Integers" by Stephen Hawking (2007):

"Looks at landmark mathematical discoveries over the past 2,500 years by such mathematicians as Euclid, Isaac Newton, Pierre Simon de Laplace, Georg Cantor, Alan Turing, and others, offering profiles of twenty-one important mathematical masters, facsimiles of their key works, and commentary on their contributions to the history of mathematics."
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top